No. It's saying that as they continue to grow, they will make it easier to track the specific person who transacted it. These things are to show off and now you're making a public connection to a public ledger.
I’ve been following this rabbit hole a bit and i think i figured something out. It might be about “compliance after the fact”. Something you downloaded now belongs to someone else. In order to verify compliance you must subject your device to audit check. All devices must be in compliance to use big tech. Therefore all must install this malware. Etc
I'm not sure I understand this. Can you rephrase it? There's definitely an element of soft compliance and I think more actions taken here will open more avenues of compliance in general.
They could purchase NFTs to target individuals so that they are not in compliance and thus deplatformed. They’ll use enforcement as justification for installing spyware.
I don't think so. NFTs will be checked against the ledgers, not against devices that don't have them. Buying NFTs already has implications that we haven't seen in fruition but it's likely just the tracking upscaled.
The NFTs will be used to establish criteria for recognizing compliant devices. Only compliant devices will be able to use big tech. They’ll purposefully acquire NFTs to force political opponent’s devices to be out of compliance.
Source: https://hbr.org/2021/11/how-nfts-create-value
No. It's saying that as they continue to grow, they will make it easier to track the specific person who transacted it. These things are to show off and now you're making a public connection to a public ledger.
I’ve been following this rabbit hole a bit and i think i figured something out. It might be about “compliance after the fact”. Something you downloaded now belongs to someone else. In order to verify compliance you must subject your device to audit check. All devices must be in compliance to use big tech. Therefore all must install this malware. Etc
I'm not sure I understand this. Can you rephrase it? There's definitely an element of soft compliance and I think more actions taken here will open more avenues of compliance in general.
They could purchase NFTs to target individuals so that they are not in compliance and thus deplatformed. They’ll use enforcement as justification for installing spyware.
I don't think so. NFTs will be checked against the ledgers, not against devices that don't have them. Buying NFTs already has implications that we haven't seen in fruition but it's likely just the tracking upscaled.
The NFTs will be used to establish criteria for recognizing compliant devices. Only compliant devices will be able to use big tech. They’ll purposefully acquire NFTs to force political opponent’s devices to be out of compliance.