So I was discussing general conspiracy theories with someone and the subject of flat Earth came up. I'm not very knowledgeable on this so I didn't do a great job explaining why someone would think the Earth is flat.
Can anyone give me the main reason why flat Earthers believe what they believe? I gather it's an elite/resources thing to restrict the plebs from some amazing hidden area that is off limits. Something to do with Antarctica?
What are the top 5 reasons people can justify this claim with that haven't already been debunked? I tried to have a look myself but there is a whole lot of crazy out there on this subject.
a) resist selling what one cannot own; resist wanting to own what others suggest they can sell. Why? Because as form (life) within flow (inception toward death); one cannot own anything; only use everything temporarily.
b) whatever others suggest; tempts one to want or not want to believe it. Question if consent to either want or not want any suggestion represents the ignorance of need? What if want represents the temptation to ignore need for form within flow?
The temptation to want or not want to consent to any suggestion (-isms); which in return causes the conflict of reason aka want versus not want. The few use suggestion (-isms) to cause division (reason) among the many; which allows them to control both sides of every conflict. After establishing the conflicts of reason; they suggest contradictions to both sides within to keep them reasoning against each other; which is called "talmudic reasoning".
As form within flow; ALL is offered to each ONEs perception (as needed inspiration). Ignoring this allows others to suggest wanted information, which those who consent to it then uphold as beliefs.
Nature does not withhold anything; it offers everything. Those who consent to others as the source of information; thereby give those others the power to hide the suggested information from those who ignore perceived inspiration.
From French élite "selection, choice". If the many ignore being the ONEs with the free will of choice; then the few become their "chosen ones", and the few suggest "elite" as constant reconfirmation about the ignorance towards free will of choice. So whenever one uses "elite"; one telegraphs to all with eyes to see that "I'm ignorant and let the few choose for me". It's a simple; rhetorical tool to keep tabs on state of domestication.
Does nature offer false information? If not...why does one try to debunk suggested information in ignorance of what nature offers (perceived inspiration)?