We can preserve everything that we currently do. We can use the money amongst ourselves and even create a new exchange system if we want. We already have many people as doctors, policemen, and lawyers to make our own autonomous country or countries.
Just don't feed the snake that bites you. If you realize that you are a slave, why would you continue to pay the rich? Cut them off of your taxes and anything else that we grant them to lie to us again and again. We don't need to fix the system, we need to replace it. 99% of your government is corrupt and we don't have time to go for them one by one. We can make a new country and the honest 1% will come to us.
To do that, we need land and internal ways of communication. They don't want to be around unvaccinated or conspiracy fact-checkers... Then so be it.
We can make our own community exactly how we want it to be made!
Aka responding by wanting vs not wanting suggested information; while ignoring perceived inspiration. What does an escape plan look like when "flow/form" represents the information they don't get? How does one walk away from that without being aware of ones own ignorance?
See; science; religion and politics are all designed around the conflict of reason and therefore suggest endless tools for ignorance to exploit; yet when facing offer/consent aka balance/choice; then all these tools become impotent for ignorance. This is where talmudic reasoning is used to attempt to undermine the source; which so far I cornered down to accusations of being a bot or on drugs.
Turns out; both suggested praise and insults represent the temptation for one to ignore positioning as choice within balance aka as ONEs evaluation within ALL predefined value. It doesn't matter what others want or not want me to be; for I already am, and in need to sustain myself as form within flow.
"all seeing eye" others suggest; "ALL seeing I am".
Nature offers ALL to each ONE...no masquerading of input. Intelligence represents individual understanding of collective knowledge perceived; not regurgitating what others suggest. It is the conflict of reason that tempts the many to perceive understanding as competition; while ignoring that it implies ONEs resonance with ALL balance for the sustenance of ONEself.
Masquerading information (secrecy) represents the response to ignoring ALL inspiration for the suggested information by other ONEs. The few withhold what the many want; while everything is offered to every ones choice of need; yet need demands struggle; while want represents temptation and so here we are.
For what? What do I offer? What's the intent? Being a snake-tongue against the "truth"; when I call out both states of "true" and "false" as being caused by reasoning (want vs not want) over suggested information?
How is "free-will-of-choice" deceptive? Could it be that those who self restrict their free will of choice by submission to the will of others; perceive what they "consented" to read; as offensive to their consented to belief systems? Yet what if others get inspired to use free will of choice instead of ignoring it...not my free will of choice; but their own?
Expose me for what? Representing inspiration for some and a pain in the ass of ignorance for others? It's your choice. Do what you want; but consider need beforehand...
Why would I consent to suggested critic-ism; when I call out all -isms constantly? I adapt to what inspires; while resisting the temptation to consent to any suggested information (-isms) by others. How could I be in a conflict of reason without consenting to the suggested -ism to reason about first? What if one doesn't need what another one wants or not wants?
So instead of questioning the implied inferiority complex triggered by suggested information; you suggest to ignore the information; which tempts them to consent to believe you; hence feeding their inferiority complex.
What is the difference between that behavior and the parasites suggesting barbiturates (pharmaceuticals) to deceive the sick to ignore the symptoms of their sickness; while getting sicker and sicker?
Also; if knowledge represents ALL perceived; then suggesting what others "should know" implies reacting in the name of (in nomine) ALL perceived reality. What if that is what's tempting others into an inferiority complex?
a) ALL through movement towards each ONE within. Short/length of ONE based on choice responding to ALL balance.
b) Logic represents reason (conflict); which represents ignorance of balance.
c) FACT, noun [Latin factum, from facio, to make or do.]...what if ONE was made by ALL and does responding to it?
"Text...why do you persecute me so much...stop tempting me to read you...you rhetorical scoundrel...I don't wanna be friends we you anymore...begone text...you are nothing but scribble...you will never be like the others...text; you're my arch nemesis...I wrote prose when you couldn't even spell...muh-hahaha...how dare you text?"
Meanwhile; I just keep adapting to whatever inspires. Thank you very much.
Being moved from inception towards death implies life being balance oriented; hence within momentum, while being tempted to be concerned over delays or lost anything. We represent temporary growth within ongoing loss; it's ones consent to believe in suggested time as affixed states (past; present and future) corrupting one from understanding this; even when the parasites suggested such an obvious sleight of hand...tick; tick; tick...
What if society represents the domestication of free will through suggestion by the few upon the many? How often will mankind fall for the same nation and civilization racket; before questioning their consent towards being fed as form right back into flow? Simple alchemy...ONEs transmutation out of base ALL.
If you only spent some time studying the things you talk about - you would eventually learn them. You only present everything from your twisted paradigm of the world so that's all you gather from it anyway.
a)STUDY, noun - "a setting of the mind or thoughts upon a subject"
As form within flow; as choice within balance; as temporary within ongoing; as ONE within ALL...I already am situated under; hence in need of self sustenance by adaptation to inspiration.
b) why fall for the temptation to spend what ones cannot own?
c) some time ignores ever changing moment (um) aka the balance; one choice responses to.
PRES'ENT, adjective [Latin proesens; proe and sum, esse, to be.] - "being in a certain place; opposed to absent". Where else could life be; than within momentum?
TWIST, verb transitive - "to unite by winding one thread" + U'NITY, noun [Latin unitas.] - "the state of being one; oneness". What if that represents the ONEness of ALL?