FOIA'd CDC Emails: Our Definition of Vaccine is "Problematic"
(www.zerohedge.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (10)
sorted by:
As form (life) within flow (inception towards death) we exist within the moment(um) of motion as choice responding to balance.
"flexibility" represents choice within balance; "to moment" represents flow causing momentum for the form within, and "moment to moment" represent ignorance towards the one and only ever changing moment of momentum.
OMNIP'OTENCE, 'OTENCY, noun [Latin omnipotens; omnis, all, and potens, powerful.] Flow represents ALL potentiality of velocity for the ONE potential resistance of form within.
Each of us represents potency out of omnipotence aka temporary growth (form) out of ongoing loss (flow).
What operates in-between perceived BLACKWHITE? Free will of choice to evaluate all perceived value within balance (black/white). The movement causing the balance (momentum) is what represents ALL value for each ONEs choice of evaluation within.
Only if one chooses to ignore perceived value (black/white balance) for suggested value (black vs white) by other (((ones))) is there a conflict. Responding to perceived represents choice of need; while responding to suggested represents choice of want vs not want. The former represents adaptation; the latter represents stagnation and is suggested by the parasitic few to the ignorant many as "reason" aka the conflcit of reason (want vs not want; true vs false; good vs bad and so on.)
Knowledge represent perceived inspiration (ongoing); belief implies consent to suggested information (affixed). Have a parasite sleight of hand from the book Dune: "'A process cannot be understood by stopping it. Understanding must move with the flow of the process, must join it and flow with it'.
One cannot comprehend (understand) what one perceives (knowledge); if one ignores perceived inspiration for suggested information. Choice needs to adapt to balance; while resisting the suggested choices by others; which represent temptation (want) to ignore adaptation (need).
I would love for you to just talk in people speak.
Been there; done that. Nature does not use words to communicate itself; us shaping words out of perceived sound; which we then suggest to each other as idolized meaning, represents the ignorance of natural communication.
How do we shape and suggest words? By choice. What defines choice? Balance (need/want)...not the suggested choices by others (want vs not want). Choice responding to balance (need over want) represents resonance (the natural communication); choice responding to suggested choices (want over need) represents dissonance to resonance aka self destruction through ignorance.
Can you tell me a topic a choice within a balance "needs" to talk about?
So we do not speak with words at all, or make any choice based on reasoning? We simply revert back to grunts and physical prowess?
I’m just not following your words completely..... what you are suggesting. I feel like you’re on to something, but you won’t come out and say it .
Tell me the end goal (of what you’re saying), and then maybe I can comprehend why you keep talking about what you’re talking about.
(This was SO much better though. Call me stupid, but I’ve not been able to make sense of what you’re trying to say. But I believe you believe it wholeheartedly, so that makes me curious.)
You just used reasoning (want vs not want); while passing judgement based on not wanting assumed outcome. You want what others suggested to you (words); you don't want to lose access to what you want. Where is your responsibility over choice aka need over want? What if self sustenance of form (life) within flow (inception towards death) needs resonance as choice to balance?
What if your want for suggested information; while ignoring perceived inspiration is the issue here. I adapt to what inspires for the sustenance of self.
What if others cannot suggest you understanding? What if your choice to adapt to perceived inspiration is what grows your comprehension? I explain a system ignored by the majority; based on my comprehension thereof. If I suggest this as truth to you; and you choose to believe me; then that does not represent you comprehending this system. It would represent you ignoring this system for my suggested explanation thereof.
This is where the parasitic few come in with spell-craft aka suggested words as idolized meaning to deceive the many to ignore perceived inspiration for suggested information. They racketeer ignorance through suggestion.
Nature explains itself and each within represents an ongoing expression of the self explanatory nature. All suggestions among ourselves about what it means represents the temptation to ignore the main source for the suggested substitute. Nature moves us; movement causes momentum; momentum represents balance; balance causes responding choice. That's each of us aka "free" will of choice in response to the "dom"inance of balance aka free-dom.
Choice of want represents temptation of outcome; choice of need represents adherence to balance. Life is not outcome oriented (inception predefines death); life is balance oriented; hence the free will of choice to respond to balance.
The parasitic few suggest progress; achievements; hope/fear towards; the way forwards etc. to deceive the many to follow the flow towards death; while ignoring resisting the flow by balancing for the sustenance of life.
Life being moved from inception towards death represents the natural order; which makes life the temporary chaos within ongoing order. One needs to resist the natural order; while others tempt one to ignore this with suggested orders.
How can anything your perceive through your senses "not make sense"?
I comprehend that all beliefs represent a) submission of will to will; b) ignorance of perceived inspiration for suggested information; c) shirking of responsibility as choice within balance to suggested choices by others; and d) self inflicted restrictions upon comprehension aka perceiving reality through the lens of suggested fiction (beliefs).