FOIA'd CDC Emails: Our Definition of Vaccine is "Problematic"
(www.zerohedge.com)
Comments (10)
sorted by:
– George Orwell
As form (life) within flow (inception towards death) we exist within the moment(um) of motion as choice responding to balance.
"flexibility" represents choice within balance; "to moment" represents flow causing momentum for the form within, and "moment to moment" represent ignorance towards the one and only ever changing moment of momentum.
OMNIP'OTENCE, 'OTENCY, noun [Latin omnipotens; omnis, all, and potens, powerful.] Flow represents ALL potentiality of velocity for the ONE potential resistance of form within.
Each of us represents potency out of omnipotence aka temporary growth (form) out of ongoing loss (flow).
What operates in-between perceived BLACKWHITE? Free will of choice to evaluate all perceived value within balance (black/white). The movement causing the balance (momentum) is what represents ALL value for each ONEs choice of evaluation within.
Only if one chooses to ignore perceived value (black/white balance) for suggested value (black vs white) by other (((ones))) is there a conflict. Responding to perceived represents choice of need; while responding to suggested represents choice of want vs not want. The former represents adaptation; the latter represents stagnation and is suggested by the parasitic few to the ignorant many as "reason" aka the conflcit of reason (want vs not want; true vs false; good vs bad and so on.)
Knowledge represent perceived inspiration (ongoing); belief implies consent to suggested information (affixed). Have a parasite sleight of hand from the book Dune: "'A process cannot be understood by stopping it. Understanding must move with the flow of the process, must join it and flow with it'.
One cannot comprehend (understand) what one perceives (knowledge); if one ignores perceived inspiration for suggested information. Choice needs to adapt to balance; while resisting the suggested choices by others; which represent temptation (want) to ignore adaptation (need).
I would love for you to just talk in people speak.
Been there; done that. Nature does not use words to communicate itself; us shaping words out of perceived sound; which we then suggest to each other as idolized meaning, represents the ignorance of natural communication.
How do we shape and suggest words? By choice. What defines choice? Balance (need/want)...not the suggested choices by others (want vs not want). Choice responding to balance (need over want) represents resonance (the natural communication); choice responding to suggested choices (want over need) represents dissonance to resonance aka self destruction through ignorance.
Can you tell me a topic a choice within a balance "needs" to talk about?
So we do not speak with words at all, or make any choice based on reasoning? We simply revert back to grunts and physical prowess?
I’m just not following your words completely..... what you are suggesting. I feel like you’re on to something, but you won’t come out and say it .
Tell me the end goal (of what you’re saying), and then maybe I can comprehend why you keep talking about what you’re talking about.
(This was SO much better though. Call me stupid, but I’ve not been able to make sense of what you’re trying to say. But I believe you believe it wholeheartedly, so that makes me curious.)
You just used reasoning (want vs not want); while passing judgement based on not wanting assumed outcome. You want what others suggested to you (words); you don't want to lose access to what you want. Where is your responsibility over choice aka need over want? What if self sustenance of form (life) within flow (inception towards death) needs resonance as choice to balance?
What if your want for suggested information; while ignoring perceived inspiration is the issue here. I adapt to what inspires for the sustenance of self.
What if others cannot suggest you understanding? What if your choice to adapt to perceived inspiration is what grows your comprehension? I explain a system ignored by the majority; based on my comprehension thereof. If I suggest this as truth to you; and you choose to believe me; then that does not represent you comprehending this system. It would represent you ignoring this system for my suggested explanation thereof.
This is where the parasitic few come in with spell-craft aka suggested words as idolized meaning to deceive the many to ignore perceived inspiration for suggested information. They racketeer ignorance through suggestion.
Nature explains itself and each within represents an ongoing expression of the self explanatory nature. All suggestions among ourselves about what it means represents the temptation to ignore the main source for the suggested substitute. Nature moves us; movement causes momentum; momentum represents balance; balance causes responding choice. That's each of us aka "free" will of choice in response to the "dom"inance of balance aka free-dom.
Choice of want represents temptation of outcome; choice of need represents adherence to balance. Life is not outcome oriented (inception predefines death); life is balance oriented; hence the free will of choice to respond to balance.
The parasitic few suggest progress; achievements; hope/fear towards; the way forwards etc. to deceive the many to follow the flow towards death; while ignoring resisting the flow by balancing for the sustenance of life.
Life being moved from inception towards death represents the natural order; which makes life the temporary chaos within ongoing order. One needs to resist the natural order; while others tempt one to ignore this with suggested orders.
How can anything your perceive through your senses "not make sense"?
I comprehend that all beliefs represent a) submission of will to will; b) ignorance of perceived inspiration for suggested information; c) shirking of responsibility as choice within balance to suggested choices by others; and d) self inflicted restrictions upon comprehension aka perceiving reality through the lens of suggested fiction (beliefs).
I mean, I get what you are saying. But why are you saying it?
Are you simply an amoeba roaming about the universe, making a home wherever you can? Being a cave man and grunting for your next need? Are words useless? Or like you say- they determine the future. I have zero desire to determine anything for anyone else, bc I’m not a megalomaniac.
We all do have free will of choice, and we do make choices on want vs need.
It seems you may want to pervert that, I’m not sure yet.
It should not be so deep or oddly worded that the common man can *not understand it. And by common, I mean an understanding level above most, but not autistic and honing one ability to the detriment of all others. (High IQ but not Prometheus Societal level)
Speak in today’s words, please. Are you autistic? A bot? (Please tell me I’m not talking to a bot.)
Don’t speak in riddles. Say what you mean to say. Spit it out. I don’t spend my life in an esoteric web of ideals, though I’m as prejudice as anyone else. But I absolutely do expect people to talk straight. It really is that simple.
Honestly and truly- speak normally. Let me get to know you before you expect me to know where you are coming from, and I can develop a tolerance for your different-speak. That dude with the “ayh” is taking of the majority of my tolerance level already. Gonna be hard to be make room for another.
Quit analyzing every comment. Just tell your opinion.
Edit: *not
What if a) ONE can take ALL has to offer and b) flow differentiates ALL potentiality into each ONE different potential? Every ONE is different within the collective ALL aka energy self segregating flow/form for loss/growth (self sustenance).
I adapt to whatever inspires (my need). You suggest others to change (your want). Do I need what others want or not want from me?
Also; EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power". No departure (quitting) in that; yet choice of ignorance exists; otherwise there couldn't be a balance of need/want.
ONE represents an expression of ALL. Consent to any suggested opinions represents ignorance thereof.
Adaptation to inspiration for the sustenance of self.
AMOEBA (Greek; amoibe) - "change" + UNIVERSE [Latin universitas from unitas.] - "the state of being one; oneness".
As form within flow we each represent ONE within ALL. Understanding this represents self discernment. After gaining self discernment understanding of ALL representing ONE in energy can be understood aka EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power" aka flow/form representing loss/growth aka the internal balance for the self sustenance of energy.
As ONE within ALL growing ONEs comprehension out of ALL perceived represents growing ONEs potential out of ALL potentiality offered. This isn't about roaming around aimlessly; but about understanding ONEs position within ALL....within the ever changing moment(um) aka the balance for ones choice to respond to.
Have you ever perceived a grunting cave man? Would grunting help with breathing; drinking; eating and sheltering?
ALL can be used by each ONE within; yet ONEs choice represents a response to balance within ALL, and suggested words represent the choice to ignore needed balance for wanted vs not wanted choices. Words tempt to ignore source of sound for substitute shaped out of sound.
On the other hand...the consequence of words represent needed inspiration to change the use thereof.
Time represents the measurement of movement (tick; tick; tick...); while to measure implies as form; by choice; in response to the momentum of motion aka from the perspective of being within the balance (momentum) of movement. Only that ever changing moment(um) exist for the temporary form within flow.
The few suggest past; present and future to deceive the many into ignoring their positioning as choice within balance. Consenting to those suggestions causes the self inflicted trauma of loss (past); hope/fear (future) and both together are causing stress (present).
This is why when the many consent to "word" based suggestions; they ignoring balancing by choice for self sustenance of life; for progressing with flow towards death. That represents a one way direction; henceforth allowing the few to comprehend outcome of every reaction made in ignorance by the many.
The accumulation of all that was now is; and all that could be is now defined by the potential of all those who choose to shape it. ALL that was; is and will be is expressed by each ONE within; yet free will of choice represents the gatekeeper for ONEs potential out of ALL potentiality.
All suggestions you make tempt others to ignore self sustenance; which in return causes their self destruction; which in return causes the ever changing circumstances you need to adapt to for your self sustenance. You represents the ONE seed within the soil of ALL and seed and soil have to be maintained in balance.
"Zero and I'm not" implies consent to believe in suggested nothingness; while ignoring being within balance, and as choice within balance need/want represent natural opposites defined by each others coexistence. Temptation (desire) will always tempt you to ignore need for want; hence the struggle to resist temptation.
You perceive conflict because you consent to believe the suggestion "want versus need". You ignore balance of need/want. Balance doesn't represent a conflict; it represents a) the response to movement (aka it's momentum) and temporary growth potential for form within flow with choice as the response to balance.
Take a treadmill as the allegory for ongoing flow. Now put yourself on it as the allegory for temporary form. You are now in momentum as form within flow; both your beginning (inception) and end (death) are predefined by the ongoing movement; while you are balancing by choice for the sustenance of the life in-between. The ongoing movement represents nonstop temptation for you to ignore your responsibility of choice to balance; yet at the same moment the ongoing flow represents the origin for your life aka the soil for your seed.
This is how balance within the same moment defines both need (self sustenance) and want (temptation to ignore need) for the responding choice. If you understood this; you wouldn't a) perceived balance as a conflict and b) you would be aware that your choice defines outcome; not the suggestions of others. You questioning what I wrote represents your choice of wanting vs not wanting my suggestions. You chose suggested information (want vs not want) over perceived inspiration (need).
We can deceive each other by suggestion into want vs not want; but we cannot "deceive" another into responding as choice to balance (need). Only ONE can choose to adhere to ALL offered (self sustenance); while resisting what other ONEs are suggesting (temptation).
I can only write so much; because I write for the sustenance of self upon inspiration perceived; not for others to suggest information. If I would put so much effort into writing for others; just to be met with majority ignorance and insults; then that would tempt me to become insolent towards them, and we already have parasites fulfilling that role.
What if nature doesn't word expression; but forms it within flow? What if understanding perceived sound requires resound (resonance) by choice? What if I cannot make another one understand what I'm not the origin of? Who is responsible for lack of "self" discernment as to who; where and why one exists...another one or oneself?
Aka wanting suggested information versus not wanting it to be too challenging. In other words: "gibs me dats understanding participation trophy".
The English language suggested represents a designed slave language (Pig-Latin); robbed of all natural connotations; filled to the brim with rhetorical subversion; pushed through the world wide web as the one world communications tool; under ongoing revisionism; used for legalese to hide maritime admiralty law underneath common law; numerically encoded to allow the few to communicate underneath the meaning the many consent to believe.
All words represent suggested ignorance; which I use as inspiration to reverse engineer language; while growing my own understanding about ignorance. Try to use me as a tool. I adapt to what you can bring to the table; so your choice can shape what you read into how you understand it. I adapt on the fly anyway and have no clue how I will respond until I do.
I learned/taught myself that the conscious memory needs to be used like a ram aka temporary storage of information; while adapting to constant inspiration; instead of like a hard-drive aka filling it up with suggested information until capacity; while restricting perceived inspiration.
I represent ONE within ALL; form within flow; choice within balance; temporary within ongoing; potential within potentiality; magnetic within electric; evaluation within value; resistance within velocity...just like everyone else.
As for your perspective...a parasite sleight of hand describes it as follows "And I am, whatever you say I am...If I wasn't, then why would I say I am?". The song is called "The Way I Am"; with way representing flow and I am the expressed form out of flow.
Am I a bot? If you go by how many others have called me a bot, then how could I not be what others suggest I am? Then again; look away from the screen (allegory of the cave) and you may ask yourself how if you're communicating with others or being deceived to mimic communication through suggested technology run by the military industrial complex; who are working upon your input in this fictitious environment.
Also; BOT aka ROBOT (from Latin roboro, from robur, strength.) What does it imply for self to call others strength?
RID'DLE, noun - "an enigma; something proposed for conjecture, or that is to be solved by conjecture; a puzzling question; an ambiguous proposition"...aka wanted outcome in ignorance of needed balance. Nature does not communicate in riddles; it offers ALL, at every moment(um) to each ONE within. What's lacking is comprehension; which has to be grown by each ONE through adaptation to ALL.
Each of us represents ONE within ALL, and ALL represents ONE in energy...as simple as that; yet comprehending this isn't as simple as "talking straight" and believing what others suggest. What I do is talk about a system the majority within is ignoring willingly; which I do by using my will to resist the temptation of ignorance. One cannot do this for others; only for the sustenance of oneself.
How could I communicate this "straight"?
a) honor implies esteem to worth; which ignores that the highest value within ALL existence represents ONEs evaluation thereof by choice of response.
b) truth implies conflict with false (conflict of reason). Neither does nature offer false information; nor does it proclaim any true information; instead it moves all within for perceived inspiration.
c) the norm for form within flow represents the rules that define how flow operates; which those within form perceive the consequences of; yet can only ever comprehend the meaning of. Perceiving movement inspires comprehension of how movement operates.
a) each ONE knows (perception) ALL; yet lacks understanding thereof.
b) you are being deceived to brand everything before interacting with it. You perceive what you read as a conflict...true vs false; want vs not want; believing vs not believing; good vs bad etc. That conflict is in your head; based on your ignorance of reality (balance; not versus). Other deliberately use suggestions to deceive you to consent to put it there.
c) the origin of all form represents flow; and the origin of flow/form represents energy. Energy doesn't have an origin; for ALL existence is within energy aka out of energy; hence us representing insane (in sanus aka within sound) and person (per sonos aka by sound); also HU'MAN, adjective [Latin humanus; Heb. form.] and AN'IMAL, noun [Latin animal from anima, air, breath, soul.] aka implicating (form) animated by (flow).
d) you are reading text; you do not communicate with another one; suggested technology is deceiving you to consent to believe that you do. Separate text from assumed avatar and try to use need over want; inspiration over information and implication (if/then) over reason (want vs not want; true vs false etc.)
Throw your own perspective back at me and watch how I adapt. I do my thing; but when another does the same; both can resonate with balance between those two perspectives. Yet what's needed for this is for both to respond to inspiration; not to suggested information.
First thing I thought of