next up? crash the global economy so they can "build back better". they are really laying the groundwork to do the final solution. it's in the open now
Something about power and money make people have these sadistic and condescending tendencies while virtue signaling how good they are. They feel we need to live for war to have purpose. However, if it’s worked so well in human history up until maybe the last 40-50 years, are we as a society doomed to keep starting wars?
what do they ever mean by "tackling climate change"? Are there any objective tangible and measurable criteria that defines this "climate change" and parameters of "addressing it"? All I ever hear from these clowns is "climate change yada yada melting ice caps magic hand waving, time to close your business, average citizen".
How about a vast, military-style campaign against vast, military-style campaigns?
All jokes aside, we should take down monarchs not because they are tyrants, but because they are monarchs.
His first sentence was good. The environment he is talking about is the business/regulatory environment. He lost me when he said that the vast, military-style campaign should have "trillions at [its] disposal--far beyond global GDP".
You'll notice I wrote [its] in square brackets. It sounded to me like he actually said "his disposal". I wonder if that was a Freudian slip and he sees himself as the leader of such a campaign.
next up? crash the global economy so they can "build back better". they are really laying the groundwork to do the final solution. it's in the open now
This thermo-nuclear-nonce needs a bayonet enema.
Something about power and money make people have these sadistic and condescending tendencies while virtue signaling how good they are. They feel we need to live for war to have purpose. However, if it’s worked so well in human history up until maybe the last 40-50 years, are we as a society doomed to keep starting wars?
what do they ever mean by "tackling climate change"? Are there any objective tangible and measurable criteria that defines this "climate change" and parameters of "addressing it"? All I ever hear from these clowns is "climate change yada yada melting ice caps magic hand waving, time to close your business, average citizen".
It's just the angle they've decided to take to justify their lil NWO fantasy.
The Royal family are nothing more than welfare whores.
how is this sick fuck still on TV after his friendship with Jimmy Saville?
How about a vast, military-style campaign against vast, military-style campaigns?
All jokes aside, we should take down monarchs not because they are tyrants, but because they are monarchs.
His first sentence was good. The environment he is talking about is the business/regulatory environment. He lost me when he said that the vast, military-style campaign should have "trillions at [its] disposal--far beyond global GDP".
You'll notice I wrote [its] in square brackets. It sounded to me like he actually said "his disposal". I wonder if that was a Freudian slip and he sees himself as the leader of such a campaign.