Both are based on the few using choice to suggest choices to the choice of the many; and consent by choice to suggested choices by choice of others puts one under the will of those suggesting.
This is why government (govern/to control + ment; from mens/mind) and RELIGION, noun [Latin religio, from religo, to bind anew; re and ligo, to bind.] represent the same modus operadi with a different sales-pitch. Both use suggestion to deceive choice to submit to choice of others.
Get religion out of politics all together and tax churches. We can't have anyone in power who believes in magical beings.
Both are based on the few using choice to suggest choices to the choice of the many; and consent by choice to suggested choices by choice of others puts one under the will of those suggesting.
This is why government (govern/to control + ment; from mens/mind) and RELIGION, noun [Latin religio, from religo, to bind anew; re and ligo, to bind.] represent the same modus operadi with a different sales-pitch. Both use suggestion to deceive choice to submit to choice of others.
Don't use 10 words when 3 will do.
If "ALL is ONE" in energy...why suggest counting?
I'm suggesting you simplify your ideas to make your point more digestible. Instead of bloating it pretentiously.