What is the usual cut and paste response to this fact ?
Because im sure believers in the big bang and expanding universe must claim everything is moving away from the center in all different directions as we move.
They shift away, start talking about refraction, or something. For them science is easy, as they can just make things up, they do not need to back it up with empirical proofs or anything like that.
Without looking it up I'd say the usual response is that the stars we see at night with the naked eye are nearby, in our own galaxy. Those stars aren't moving away from us, but are locked in rotation with us around the galactic center. Also, a few thousand years of recorded history is not long enough to see a difference on a galactic timescale (millions of years).
And yet the stars have remained in their consistent courses for all of recorded history. That model defies logic and reason.
I was just going to say that. Orion is recorded 6000 years ago in the same pattern we see it today.
What is the usual cut and paste response to this fact ?
Because im sure believers in the big bang and expanding universe must claim everything is moving away from the center in all different directions as we move.
They shift away, start talking about refraction, or something. For them science is easy, as they can just make things up, they do not need to back it up with empirical proofs or anything like that.
Without looking it up I'd say the usual response is that the stars we see at night with the naked eye are nearby, in our own galaxy. Those stars aren't moving away from us, but are locked in rotation with us around the galactic center. Also, a few thousand years of recorded history is not long enough to see a difference on a galactic timescale (millions of years).