What is the usual cut and paste response to this fact ?
Because im sure believers in the big bang and expanding universe must claim everything is moving away from the center in all different directions as we move.
They shift away, start talking about refraction, or something. For them science is easy, as they can just make things up, they do not need to back it up with empirical proofs or anything like that.
Without looking it up I'd say the usual response is that the stars we see at night with the naked eye are nearby, in our own galaxy. Those stars aren't moving away from us, but are locked in rotation with us around the galactic center. Also, a few thousand years of recorded history is not long enough to see a difference on a galactic timescale (millions of years).
Well, technically, most people are just too stupid and angry to actually look for any evidence nowadays. They only read nasa bs without knowing basic physics laws or any math whatsoever. They really think there is a fiery ball in vacuum that persisted without any materials being burnt out for over 6000 years of recorded history.
I am at least thankful that this place has smart people posting. Please continue posting!
Round like a pancake, all we ever seen is one side of the moon. Do not really know why infinite space is ok, but infinite plane is not. Anyway, what is beyond the ice wall, I have no idea, as the information is being gatekept from us.
What are the odds a random space particle explosion made earth, a moon and sun that can perfectly eclipse over each other when the moon is “27 million times smaller than the sun and 390 million miles closer.”
Great point. It’s statistically impossible. Let alone the fact that the whole Big Bang theory can’t be validated just like macro evolution. Frankly tired of ‘scientists’ not understanding the scientific epistemology that is limited for a reason. Most of them can’t even explain the criteria that makes a theory. Sorry, but a generalized statement after the fact is not science.
And yet the stars have remained in their consistent courses for all of recorded history. That model defies logic and reason.
I was just going to say that. Orion is recorded 6000 years ago in the same pattern we see it today.
What is the usual cut and paste response to this fact ?
Because im sure believers in the big bang and expanding universe must claim everything is moving away from the center in all different directions as we move.
They shift away, start talking about refraction, or something. For them science is easy, as they can just make things up, they do not need to back it up with empirical proofs or anything like that.
Without looking it up I'd say the usual response is that the stars we see at night with the naked eye are nearby, in our own galaxy. Those stars aren't moving away from us, but are locked in rotation with us around the galactic center. Also, a few thousand years of recorded history is not long enough to see a difference on a galactic timescale (millions of years).
Well, technically, most people are just too stupid and angry to actually look for any evidence nowadays. They only read nasa bs without knowing basic physics laws or any math whatsoever. They really think there is a fiery ball in vacuum that persisted without any materials being burnt out for over 6000 years of recorded history.
I am at least thankful that this place has smart people posting. Please continue posting!
and yet you want me to believe the earth is on some infinite plane that is flat, while everything else we see is round? lol
Round like a pancake, all we ever seen is one side of the moon. Do not really know why infinite space is ok, but infinite plane is not. Anyway, what is beyond the ice wall, I have no idea, as the information is being gatekept from us.
What are the odds a random space particle explosion made earth, a moon and sun that can perfectly eclipse over each other when the moon is “27 million times smaller than the sun and 390 million miles closer.”
Great point. It’s statistically impossible. Let alone the fact that the whole Big Bang theory can’t be validated just like macro evolution. Frankly tired of ‘scientists’ not understanding the scientific epistemology that is limited for a reason. Most of them can’t even explain the criteria that makes a theory. Sorry, but a generalized statement after the fact is not science.