"Evidently Baugh acquired the boot during the late 1990's and added it to his collection of other alleged anti-evolutionary objects in his "Creation Evidence Museum" in Glen Rose, Texas. Baugh and his former partner Don Patton assert that the boot contains "fossilized" bone and flesh, but other than the unpublished and unverified C.T. scans, have not provided any rigorous evidence to support these claims."
So a creationist with a financial interest in this being what he claims will provide exactly zero proof that backs up his extraordinary claim. In other words just another religious grifter making a buck off of those who are intellectually unfortunate.
So no tests were performed from 1980 to 1990?
How was the value of the foot boot determined?
Doesn’t the smithsonian do the same thing. They have stuff that will mostly never see the light of day again. Why?
"Evidently Baugh acquired the boot during the late 1990's and added it to his collection of other alleged anti-evolutionary objects in his "Creation Evidence Museum" in Glen Rose, Texas. Baugh and his former partner Don Patton assert that the boot contains "fossilized" bone and flesh, but other than the unpublished and unverified C.T. scans, have not provided any rigorous evidence to support these claims."
So a creationist with a financial interest in this being what he claims will provide exactly zero proof that backs up his extraordinary claim. In other words just another religious grifter making a buck off of those who are intellectually unfortunate.
So no tests were performed from 1980 to 1990? How was the value of the foot boot determined? Doesn’t the smithsonian do the same thing. They have stuff that will mostly never see the light of day again. Why?