Past history has not falsified that hypothesis that some centralization is necessary for a movement to succeed. What do you got? You're like a college professor spouting convoluted theory that has not been out in the real world.

And everything man touches in this world eventually falls into rot and decay. That centralized power corrupts and must be fought back against, and yes, the rebels soon become what they despised. Civilizations rise and fall. It's called entropy. Is this supposed to somehow undermine my thesis? In the long run, we are all dead too, ya know.

But the lone rebel, in the end is just that, a lone rebel that fails to make change. You're a Unibomber type. I get it. Keep doing what you're doing. Undermining authority that is corrupt is very useful.

However, at this point, this conversation is done. You can have the last word.