Never seen anything like this
(media.conspiracies.win)
Comments (9)
sorted by:
There's multiple articles saying vaers is misinformation because "there's a concerted effort by anti-vax activists to skew the information".
So they think that, despite the difficulties in creating a report, and despite zero evidence of any organized campaign to skew the numbers, we are collectively skewing the numbers by MILLIONS. What a bunch of conspiracy theorists.
VAERS was created as a warning system to let us know if something was wrong. Now that the warning system is blaring while an experimental emergency-use-authorized jab is being administered, they want us to ignore it.
Yea its baffling to me that they claim a "scientific consensus" on the vaccines (edit: experimental gene therapy) safety. Then you show a source that dispels that myth and its always "that's just one person!" Like how many scientists, nurses, physicians, and general health professionals will it take to be more than "just one person" to these folks? Sure as hell is a pretty large group of "just one person" at this point.
I saw a comment thread once that went like this:
"Ask your doctor and listen to them! They will know what's best for you"
"Ok, and what if my doctor is Dr Pierre Kory and he told me to not get the vaccine?"
"Well if that's the case then you should be seeking a second opinion"
Ohhhh, ok. So the proper "scientific" way to behave is to form your own opinion by watching mass media, then discard all "expert" opinions until you find one that you agree with? huh. That sounds an awful lot like what they accuse the "conspiracy theorists" of doing.
"in an unprecedented manner, hundreds of thousands of individuals have reported adverse events (AEs) using the Vaccine Adverse Events Reports System (VAERS).
We used VAERS data to examine cardiac AEs, primarily myocarditis, reported following injection of the first or second dose of the COVID-19 …"
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Jessica+Rose%2C+Peter+McCullough&btnG=
I like how FB Fact-Checker labeled an article as misleading, but then in the body summary of the reason for the "misleading" label, FB admits that the article checked is actually fact, and FB states such, but still leave the tag on the video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaODeUAupc0&
In this era, medical science has lost all credibility, it will have to re-establish it with sane behavior. It is time to put the brakes on medical claims by the establishment, and set up a system of independent multiple review of experiments as well as gathered data. We must demand independently verified proof of industry claims, and loudly reject unproven ones.
You can bet that pharma money too has been applied to censor the publication.