Covid: There Is No Virus
(www.westonaprice.org)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (12)
sorted by:
Here’s how you could say they should prove there’s the existence of a virus. You take sick people who have probably the same symptoms and then you look through their bodily fluids. Remember, a virus we’re talking about is a particle. It’s a thing. It’s not a feeling or a thought or an idea or a theory. It’s a protein coat with a piece of genetic material on the inside. It can be seen under an electron microscope. The idea is you take these people who have the same symptoms. You look through their bodily fluid. You do the steps called macerate, filter, centrifuge.
It comes out in a band. You suck the band out. You look at the band, it has identical morphology, shape, size, characteristics. That is the virus. This was how bacteria fascists were found. This is how a virologist used to be called, named Stefan Lanka, found the first virus in the ocean. It was the steps that were listed by the Pasteur Institute in 1973, as to how to find a virus. Bodily fluid, blood, sputum, snot, urine, something, purify the virus from that fluid, macerate, filter, centrifuge, suck it out, look at it, then you can find out what it’s made of.
I am here to tell everybody that in the entire history of the published medical research, there is not one so-called pathogenic disease-causing virus that has ever been found in one bodily fluid of one person. Not HIV, Ebola, Zika and SARS-CoV-2. If anybody disagrees with that, Andy, Stefan and I are hosting an event, where anybody who has a paper showing they found a pathogenic virus in the bodily fluid of a single human being can present the paper and we’ll give them time to explain how they did that, what they found. We will critique it.
Here are the people who agree with what I said, that not one pathogenic virus has ever been found in any bodily fluid of any sick person. Number one, 120 different health institutions around the world, like the CDC, FDA and the NIH and the equivalent Ontario Health Ministry. One hundred twenty of these institutions under the Freedom of Information Act have said in writing, “We have no reported published studies of any SARS-CoV-2 being found in any bodily fluid of any sick person.”
The next people who agree with this are the authors of the six major papers on the isolation of SARS-CoV-2 in writing, all agreed, they never found any particle called SARS-CoV-2 in any bodily fluid of directly in any sick person. Finally, I was asked to speak to a group of lawyers and activists about this and medical doctors. They invited a guy who was twenty years, senior virologist pathologists at the Wuhan Center for Virology and then twenty years Yale pathologist, ahead of their diagnostic virology lab. He was going to tell me that I was wrong and I’m an idiot.
We said, “Is there any paper showing SARS-CoV-2 found in any bodily fluid?” He said, “No.” We said, “Why not?” He said, “There’s not enough virus to see.” Which begs the question, if there’s not enough virus to see, on what theory is it killing us all? Andy had the presence of mind to say, “What about if you mix ten people’s sputum together, would there then be enough virus to see?” He said, “No.” We asked him, “A hundred people, would you then have enough virus to see? He said, “No.” We said, “A thousand people, you mix their sputum together. Would you have enough to see?” He said, “No.”
We said, “Ten thousand people?” He said, “No.” He wouldn’t answer anymore. If you think that you can find this virus in any bodily fluid of any sick person, you are sorely mistaken. There is no published case that that has ever been done. The question is, how did they say they’ve isolated this virus? I’ve read 200 papers called the isolation of such and such a virus. Here’s how they do it. They take the fluid of a sick person. They filter it, which is not purification. They have filtered snot. They mixed that with gentamicin, amphotericin, which are two nephrotoxic antibiotics.
They mix that with fetal calf serum. They inoculated that on monkey kidney cells. The kidney cells break down. They see particles that we now know are broken down kidney cells and they say, “That’s the virus.” That nonsense, which we’ve now proven happens without the addition of any snot from anybody. We repeated the experiment, except we didn’t add snot from anybody. It broke down in exactly the same way. Proving that the breakdown of the monkey kidney cells, which is called the isolation is a farce.
It is an anti-scientific disproven bit of nonsense that has been erroneous mostly by some deception, which I don’t understand. Maybe Sally knows more about the words. Why they call that isolation and every analysis of the genome and every picture is done on that disproven snot breakdown. The other thing we did in this experiment is we added yeast RNA to this mixture of broken-down monkey kidney cells. We then aligned, meaning we found the entire genome of SARS-CoV-2, even though no virus was ever in there.
Nothing from anybody with COVID or Coronavirus or any sickness was put into this mix. Yet we were able to, using the same process they did, create the entire genome of SARS-CoV-2, proving that the genome doesn’t exist in that mixture, which they say it doesn’t. It is a manufactured genome as are all the variants, as are this nonsense of a lab created virus.
The whole idea is a misconception. It’s what happens when your tissues break down. They break down and form particles. This is an out-fection, not an infection. It’s what happens if you blow up your house, you get little bits of paper. Nobody thinks the little bits of paper infected your house.
I was just going to say these genomes that they get, they’re getting sequences that are like minuscule fraction of the entire genome. You could call those an artifact and it’s an artifact of the assumptions that they have made to get this genome.
Sally, you’re correct. Here’s the artifacts. Here’s what we did. You take the monkey kidney cells. You break it down by starving it and poisoning it. That’s the minimum nutrient medium. That’s the amphotericin, gentamycin. You add yeast RNA. It breaks down. You break the RNA pieces into little pieces, exactly what they do. You try to align those little pieces into the whole genome. It’s like you have a bunch of words and you try to make Hamlet. You try to piece the words together but you’ve never seen Hamlet. All you have is a bunch of words.
What happens is if you have to amplify it so you can see it and if you do with twelve cycles of the PCR process, you get 20% of the genome. You do it up to 30 cycles and you get 98.5% of the genome, which means that the PCR process itself generated 78% of the sequences. I don’t know Sally if you caught that. The sequences that they’re using are generated by the PCR amplification process itself. Every single genome study that I’ve read uses 45 cycles, which means they amplify it and create all new segments, like creating millions and billions of words. They put Hamlet into the computer and they say, “Arrange these words into the play Hamlet.” It does and it makes mistakes and then they say, “We found the genome.” When it makes mistakes, that’s the Delta variant.
There are 479,000 published variants of the imaginary genome because it doesn’t exist. Every time the computer does it, it makes a new genome. The California Health Department, in writing, said, “They have no analysis whatsoever of any Delta variant.” This is a spell. It’s a big old anti-scientific hoax.
Using a lot of scientific words and coming up with explanations, like the Delta variant for explaining why people who’ve been vaccinated are getting sick, why more people are getting sick and they’ve got a whole Greek alphabet.
That’s the idea that if we have these bacteria or viruses, they’re so small and they come out in our breath or on our hands and this is how we pass these diseases from one person to another. This is the explanation for why a whole bunch of people get sick at the same time. We have a wonderful example of this with the Spanish flu, which according to what we read killed 50 million people and there were a lot more people who got sick.
The US Public Health Department did their level best to show that this was contagious. They had sick people breathe on well people, get right up to their faces and breathe on them. They injected well people with the blood of sick people. They took a thing to spray the snot and stuff of sick people down the throats of the well people. In that one pace, would they make somebody sick who was well?
They showed that the Spanish flu was not contagious. Another wonderful example is smallpox. That was considered highly contagious. There was a doctor in San Antonio, Texas who had a clinic there. He believed and showed very well that smallpox was caused by the bites of bedbugs. It was serious on people with what he called an ascorbate deficiency, Vitamin C deficiency.
The idea was that if you just were around the bed clothes or in a room of somebody who had smallpox, that you would get it. He and his coworkers often went into these rooms. He said he would shake the bedclothes, shake the rugs and breathe in this so-called infected air and not he nor any of his associates got sick from this. He said, “We were very careful. If you got bitten by a bed bug, you could get sick.” When he was able to clear out all the bed bugs, nobody in his clinic got sick from smallpox. If they did get bitten, he made them eat fruits and vegetables for vitamin C.
Smallpox in the Western world has completely disappeared. We don’t have bed bugs anymore. We don’t live our lives with insects because we have vacuum cleaners and screens in our windows. We don’t have them anymore. In other countries, they still do have bed bugs but somebody needs to do a study on the saliva of bed bugs. What’s in it that made people break out in this terrible rash? To get rid of some poison.
Bravo.... just fucking BRAVO!!!! I listened to several doctors at the beginning of this "plandemic" and they were saying the same thing you are. I've been a conspiracy person since 2001. A lot have. I thought it crazy. But the more I did research, the more I found what you are saying to be correct. I listened to Dr. Cowan and Dr. Kaufman... they recommended i read The Invisible Rainbow by Arthur Firstenburg. Wow... Terrain theory and exosomes make so much more sense... Germ Theory is perhaps the biggest criminal conspiracy. Period... these scamming fucks make exorbitant amounts of money off of sick people and that, to me, is truly fucking disgusting... do you have any other books that you recommend reading? Thank you again for this post... EVERYONE in the world needs to hear what you have to say.
Those were quotes from the linked podcast. Dr. Cowan saying most of it. The rest of the podcast is good, too. I stopped copying and pasting when my phone started acting up.
Dr. Cowan's book, Vaccines, Autoimmunity, and the Changing Nature of Childhood Illness got me started on this path. I read it before my first kid was born. I do agree that germ theory is the biggest conspiracy out there. It also proves you don't have to knowingly be part of a conspiracy to be part of a conspiracy.
Other books to check out:
Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and the Forgotten History by Suzanne Humphries
Béchamp or Pasteur? A Lost Chapter in the History of Biology by Ethel Douglas Hume
Pasteur: Plagiarist, Impostor – The Germ Theory Exploded by R.B. Pearson
The Contagion Myth: Why Viruses (including "Coronavirus") Are Not the Cause of Disease by Dr. Cowan and Sally Fallon Morell (the podcast guests)
Actually, head mod Axo posted a link a month or so ago: https://pastelink.net/germtheory