What if we represent form (life) within flow (inception towards death) aka power of resistance (form) within power of velocity (flow), and our ignorance thereof tempts others to exploit it?
What if OCCULT', adjective [Latin occultus, occulo; ob and celo, to conceal.] represents the choice of ignorance (want over need) causing ones lack of comprehension about all perceived; which other ones exploit by suggestion of endless more wants (temptations)?
What if nature doesn't offer good or evil states; but instead represents a balance (value) your choice (evaluation) needs to respond to; yet is tempted to want to ignore? What if you choose to evaluate by choice what the choices of others are suggesting you to believe/not believe as "good" or "evil"; which then causes the conflict of reason (good versus evil)?
What if the few use suggestion (-isms) to cause division (reason) among the many; which they control from both sides by further suggesting contradictions to both sides within reason (talmudic reasoning) to keep them reasoning about suggestions made by the choices of others?
What if choice represents a reaction to balance, and the suggestions of other choices represents the temptation to ignore balance?
Too long? Question this...what if ignorance of the many tempts insolence among the few?
What if we represent form (life) within flow (inception towards death) aka power of resistance (form) within power of velocity (flow), and our ignorance thereof tempts others to exploit it?
What if OCCULT', adjective [Latin occultus, occulo; ob and celo, to conceal.] represents the choice of ignorance (want over need) causing ones lack of comprehension about all perceived; which other ones exploit by suggestion of endless more wants (temptations)?
What if nature doesn't offer good or evil states; but instead represents a balance (value) your choice (evaluation) needs to respond to; yet is tempted to want to ignore? What if you choose to evaluate by choice what the choices of others are suggesting you to believe/not believe as "good" or "evil"; which then causes the conflict of reason (good versus evil)?
What if the few use suggestion (-isms) to cause division (reason) among the many; which they control from both sides by further suggesting contradictions to both sides within reason (talmudic reasoning) to keep them reasoning about suggestions made by the choices of others?
What if choice represents a reaction to balance, and the suggestions of other choices represents the temptation to ignore balance?
Too long? Question this...what if ignorance of the many tempts insolence among the few?