Charles Fort (1874-1932) was a fascinating figure that dared to challenge the scientific status quo. Fort specialized in the collection data that he declared to be "damned" because it refused to fit in the acceptable range of scientific orthodoxy.
Here are some of the stated goals of his eponymous Fortean Society:
-
To remove the halo from the head of Science.
-
To make human beings think.
-
To destroy scientists' faith in their own works and thus force a general return to the truly scientific principle of "temporary acceptance".
-
To inform the general public of the political and self-preservative character of most work done under the ambiguous cloak of "pure" science, principally astronomy and physics.
-
To inform the general public that the "cosmic order" Science pretends to have established in the flux of existence is simply a mental discipline imposed upon mankind as an expedient to enforce social and economic "order" under what must be--at longest--an ephemeral status quo.
-
To prevent scientists from further development of any hierarchy, Brain Trust, Court of Wisdom, authoritarian dictatorship of intelligence or learning, which would--if permitted--lead to a more powerful domination and consequent paralysis of human mentality than any ever imposed by any Church or State or Press in history, not excluding any of the ideologies current today.
-
To destroy awe for Authority, as such, in the youth of the world at as tender an age as possible.
-
To provide the means for the perpetuation of dissent from any and all dogmas as long as time shall last.
What do you think? Are we not the spiritual successors, the very embodiment of the aims of the Fortean Society from a century ago?
They were heavily maligned in their time, as are we. We dare to challenge the $cientific orthodoxy, because it must be challenged.
Here are the published works of Charles Fort:
The Book of the Damned (1919)
New Lands (1923)
Lo! (1931)
Wild Talents (1932)
Suggested -ism vs suggested -ism doesn't challenge the status quo of submission to suggestion.
SCI'ENCE, noun [Latin scientia, from scio, to know.] from knowledge (to perceive). The status quo for all perceived represents ones response to all perceived as form (life) within flow (inception towards death). In short..."to know" represents "to response to perceived movement".
Suggested scientism represents suggested information over perceived inspiration; hence ignorance of movement causing idolization of affixed information.
Holding onto suggested information represents ignoring to adapt to perceived inspiration; hence being condemned to consequence of ignorance.
...are in ignorance of being in balance; while being moved forward; hence life representing a resistance within being moved from inception towards death. All goals aim towards death; hence representing the temptation to ignore the balance that sustains life.
The halo; the crown; the corona represents an allegory for lack of comprehension (understanding) caused by ignorance towards perceived inspiration for suggested information. The few who flash the crown symbolism are guarding the growth of comprehension among the many by utilizing suggestion to deceive the many to consent to ignorance (choice of want over need), and thereby self restrict their own growth of comprehension.
That implies by means of suggestion aka in submission to the will of those suggesting the -ism. In this case as switch from Scientism to Forteanism. That doesn't represent thinking about what nature offers towards perception; but what others suggest one to ignore perceived for.
Suggesting another -ism doesn't destroy faith (consent to submission to will of others) it just deceives the faithful to change what he has faith in.
Force of flow (velocity) causes force of form (resistance). Form responds to flow by choice. Inception represents flow to form; death represents form to flow. Both states exist within the same flow; so life represents transmutation out of and back into base.
That implies temporary chocie of form in response to ongoing balance within flow; yet here represents acceptance of suggested -ism; while ignoring balance.
Each one within flow already is "in form" and therefore doesn't need other form to suggest information. We represent in formed animation.
That implies choice responding to balance for the sustenance of form within flow; not choice consenting to suggestions of other choice; while ignoring to respond to balance.
The flow moving form from beginning towards end represents the natural order for all within; which form ignores when consenting to suggested orders by other form.
Sleight of hand right there...FLUX, noun [Latin fluxus, fluo, fluxi.] - "the act of flowing; the motion"; yet the implication of motion isn't suggested...the response within the momentum of motion.
Suggested laws of men to those who consent to ignore perceived laws of nature (defined by flow upon form).
Choice responding to balance (need over want) causes hierarchy based on self sustenance; while choice of want over need ignores this for the suggestions of others choice; which causes a chain of command hierarchy of the many under the suggestions of the few. The chain of command aka beast system aka pyramid scheme represents a hierarchy based on the temptation of ignorance; hence causing the party line; the mainstream narrative; the order followers; the none player characters (NPCs); the goyim; the golem; the useless eaters etc.
Free will of choice represents ones sole authority over self within balance. No other choice can choose for one to respond to balance (need/want) under natural law as form within flow.
AWE, noun aw. [Gr. to be astonished.] - "fear mingled with admiration or reverence; reverential fear". All fears are defined by outcome; hence death; which implies a temptation for life to ignore self sustenance by choice based response to balance (adaptation). Temptation demands resistance; yet tempts ignorance.
As form within flow one represents the formed response to being perpetuated by ongoing flow; and it is flow that provide the means of balance/choice as well as self differentiation and conscious perception; memory and comprehension.
DISSENT, verb intransitive [Latin , to think.] - "to disagree in opinion; to differ; to think in a different or contrary manner". Agreement versus disagreement represents the conflict of reason (want vs not want) of suggestion by the choice of those consenting to it. Both sides of reason (want vs not want) respond to the suggested choices of others; while ignoring to respond to balance.
Form represents the response to flow; and dissent towards flow represents ignorance of form aka self destruction by ignoring to balance for self sustenance.
Form (life) doesn't need to follow flow (inception towards death); it needs to resist succession. How? By choice based adaptation as form to flow (balancing). One such demanded response to being moved represents breathing aka SPIR'IT, noun [Latin spiritus, from spiro, to breathe, to blow. The primary sense is to rush or drive.]
Try using both body and mind to stop yourself breathing and let flow teach form a little lesson about responsibility of choice within balance. The parasites showed you a recent sleight of hand for this..."I can't breathe" leads to death. Then they tested the ignorance of the many by suggesting to "put a mask over your nose and mouth". What followed was mass consent to spiritual suicide by ignorance aka life ignoring responsibility over choice within balance.
Challenging temptation implies consent to suggested why choosing to be against it instead of for it. The few suggest (abortion); the many consent by either being for it (pro-choice) or against it (pro-life); which puts those who consented into the conflict of reason (pro-life vs pro-choice) against each other; while ignoring the sleight of hand right in-front of their faces...life equals choice; and yet half a century of pro-life vs pro-choice ignorance is what is sustaining abortion.
It doesn't matter which side one chooses to reason about; only that one consented to want or not want a suggestion.