I think pluralism is a trap. There are lenses sure but there’s ultimate truth which is mostly plainly viewed through the mend which least interferes with its qualities. Thus I believe in a Truth and caution about using the aggregate of multiple lenses.
Every lens distorts, if you want learn the true nature of the object you're viewing you need to deeply understand the defects in your lens. This is most easily achieved by comparing the distortions of different lenses.
I do understand where you are coming from though, and wouldn't argue that you are wrong.
I think pluralism is a trap. There are lenses sure but there’s ultimate truth which is mostly plainly viewed through the mend which least interferes with its qualities. Thus I believe in a Truth and caution about using the aggregate of multiple lenses.
If all is one then there is no pluralism.
Every lens distorts, if you want learn the true nature of the object you're viewing you need to deeply understand the defects in your lens. This is most easily achieved by comparing the distortions of different lenses.
I do understand where you are coming from though, and wouldn't argue that you are wrong.