dOnT gO dOwN tHe RaBbIt HoLe
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (26)
sorted by:
A story suggested by human language as an account of past transactions; yet a) there's no debt (account) from from one person (per sonsus aka by sound) to another; and b) each of us represents the accumulation of all things "past". All that was is now; and so is all that can be; for ALL is ONE in energy.
Implies choice of evaluation for measurement in response to balance of value to be measured. "Everything on the surface dies"...ignores form being in the momentum of flow aka in balance. Death represents form to flow transmutation; as oppose to inception representing flow to form transmutation out of base energy.
So far I'm at flow (velocity) meeting form (resistance) representing the cause of friction; vibration; resonance and heat; which thereby implies the natural opposite...liquid based cooling (water; oil; seed; blood etc,) and liquid because it represents that which remains of temporary form within ongoing flow, hence blood representing the self of self sustenance aka our shared identity.
What I'm still hazy about is the accumulation of water; ice; oil etc. in response to our choice of need/want aka growth/loss aka self sustenance/ignorance. Energy self segregates to use differentiation as inspiration for growth; hence us needing to adapt to perceived inspiration to grow our comprehension; yet how ignorance influences form based storage of liquids hasn't clicked yet.
As life I represent the balance within the movement from my inception towards my death...aka struggle to resist ongoing loss representing potential of growth. So a) whatever happens doesn't change me struggling to sustain self and b) as form within flow; anything flow has to offer...form can take. Why? Because form represents the reaction to flow. We represent the temporary resistance of growth to the velocity of ongoing loss...ONE can take ALL loss.
Let me quote rofschild here; "I do affirmatively state that the Mayan "timeline" IS a distraction and has no relevance to "future" events".
What's the main revisionism done from Aztec to Mayan from your point of understanding?