The numbers are not "random". Theyre bullshit, but not random. They are coded. 3,6,9 are about as overrepresented in "news" as "african americans" are on tv.
Numbers are racist. Demanding accuracy is math is a form of white supremacy. The journalist was reporting her own truth. How dare you question her lived experience?
These guys don't know how to lie. You take the real number, and put a zero on the end. If someone discovers the truth, you say it was a mistake, and they'll probably believe you!
63000 is too much. I give it a mere 1 - 1500 in 19 months.
I was gonna say, 63k is ridiculous. They just throw random numbers around as shock value without being able to prove any of it.
The numbers are not "random". Theyre bullshit, but not random. They are coded. 3,6,9 are about as overrepresented in "news" as "african americans" are on tv.
Good point. That’s true.
Notice how no one ever "accidentally" publishes stats lower than the real numbers
Numbers are racist. Demanding accuracy is math is a form of white supremacy. The journalist was reporting her own truth. How dare you question her lived experience?
Why the hell do I care what the New York Times is writing?
Classic fat finger. Meant to type 63,000 fat fingered 800,000.
These guys don't know how to lie. You take the real number, and put a zero on the end. If someone discovers the truth, you say it was a mistake, and they'll probably believe you!