Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

4
One of the top results for, is gravity a theory, on ddg (ncse.ngo)
posted 4 years ago by Allas8 4 years ago by Allas8 +5 / -1
46 comments share
46 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (46)
sorted by:
▲ 1 ▼
– InfidelCastro11 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Which way is up without gravity

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Allas8 [S] 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Normally you would say that up is up. If you look at the North star, no matter where on earth you see it, no matter what time of day, that be up.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– InfidelCastro11 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

You don't seem to understand the point of the question. Why don't things fall upwards in your worldview

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Allas8 [S] 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Because a object that is denser than air will fall down, until it finds it buoyancy level, or it is physical stopped. That is why helium rises, as it is lighter than air, so it goes up until it finds it buoyancy level, or it is contained.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Poiuytrew 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Buoyancy is dependent on gravity, or some other force to push/pull things, so you're defeating yourself here. You still have to account for this external force, which means that you haven't provided an alternative to gravitational theory.

The buoyancy argument is seriously disinfo. If you want to dive into the flat earth space, you need to have a complete understanding of the system you're trying to disprove, and not just parrot things you've heard.

The only viable alternative system to gravity that I've seen is the theory Tesla believed in which describes a magno-electric universe.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 1 ▼
– InfidelCastro11 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

But what determines which direction this happens in? This logically necessitates another force. It makes no sense otherwise

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - nxltw (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy