Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

4
One of the top results for, is gravity a theory, on ddg (ncse.ngo)
posted 4 years ago by Allas8 4 years ago by Allas8 +5 / -1
46 comments share
46 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (46)
sorted by:
▲ 1 ▼
– Allas8 [S] 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Because a object that is denser than air will fall down, until it finds it buoyancy level, or it is physical stopped. That is why helium rises, as it is lighter than air, so it goes up until it finds it buoyancy level, or it is contained.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Poiuytrew 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Buoyancy is dependent on gravity, or some other force to push/pull things, so you're defeating yourself here. You still have to account for this external force, which means that you haven't provided an alternative to gravitational theory.

The buoyancy argument is seriously disinfo. If you want to dive into the flat earth space, you need to have a complete understanding of the system you're trying to disprove, and not just parrot things you've heard.

The only viable alternative system to gravity that I've seen is the theory Tesla believed in which describes a magno-electric universe.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Allas8 [S] 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

You make claims, with no proof to back it up, but that is how it always been with gravity. A object seeks its natural buoyancy level, I do not know what that is so hard to understand. The more dense a object is, the lower its buoyancy level is. Once a object has reached its buoyancy level, it is not going to move up or down, unless outside forces affect it (like the wind).

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Poiuytrew 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

I'm not pushing gravity, I'm explaining that buoyancy is not a replacement to gravity.

Why do more dense objects always fall towards the earth? Because boyuancy is dependent on an external force to provide directionality.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– Allas8 [S] 0 points 4 years ago +1 / -1

Ok, glad you are not pushing gravity. Here you can see a experiment on how a object finds it buoyancy level based on its relative surroundings.

https://youtu.be/fnVLwqud_OA

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 1 ▼
– InfidelCastro11 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

But what determines which direction this happens in? This logically necessitates another force. It makes no sense otherwise

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Allas8 [S] 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

The heavier, more dense, a object is, the lower its buoyancy level is. The more dense a object is, the further down it will fall. No more forces are needed, only different density and buoyancy levels.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– InfidelCastro11 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

You do need a force. Things do not move without a force applied to them. Your worldview does not explain why denser objects don't fall sideways, it's basic logic that the direction things fall must be determined by something. Do you believe the earth is flat, by any chance

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– Allas8 [S] 0 points 4 years ago +1 / -1

that is up and down and how different density and buoyancy levels work

Yes and the force is called up and down. Once a object found it relevant buoyancy level, it will stay level, until a upward, or downward force is applied to it.

Why would things fall sideways? That makes no sense. I see no point in trying to explain why something does not do something it should not be doing.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - j6rsh (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy