The papers were peer reviewed. Jones also wasn't the only person to work on the nano thermate theory. How else can you explain the presence of this material in the debris of the WTC buildings. How else do you explain the motel metal .. and the steel still glowing red hot weeks after 9/11 ?
The papers were peer reviewed. Jones also wasn't the only person to work on the nano thermate theory. How else can you explain the presence of this material in the debris of the WTC buildings. How else do you explain the motel metal .. and the steel still glowing red hot weeks after 9/11 ?
I'm not saying zero nano-thermite was used, just that it couldn't possibly have been the main mechanism that brought down/dustified the towers.
ALSO, these materials CAN result from the Hutchison Effect apparently. Read the current stickied megathread on the DEW hypothesis.
Fake news! You definitely haven't read the DEW megathread then.
Steven Jones was caught ALTERING IMAGES to make them REDDER and appear hotter to support the "glowing red" red herring.
The molten metal aspect appears to be disinfo. Read that thread!
Unfortunately, it doesn't matter if "other people" are working on the nano-thermite theory.
What matters is a CONFIRMED SPOOK is championing the theory.
Does that automatically discredit thermite? Well, no, but anyone championing Jones/thermite WITHOUT mentioning his sketchy past is MAD SUS.
The dude is literally the epitome of glowiedom.
I really respect you btw and don't mean to cast aspersions on the efforts of many 9/11 truthers.
However, I will continue to maintain that nano-thermite is a red herring. Was it used? Possibly. Was it the ONLY thing used? DEFINITELY NOT.
Steel was definitely glowing red hot weeks after 9/11. https://www.metabunk.org/metamirror_cache/s3.amazonaws.com_nasathermalimages_public_images_Molten_20metal_Sillechia_1.JPG
There are many more images like that