This is an excellent conversation, and following presentation, for anyone who has the time. They feature Bob Greenyer of the Martin Fleishman Memorial Project, and Andrew Johnson of checktheevidence.com, and they are about 9/11 in general, but specifically features new ideas and info about the iron-rich micro-spheres found in the dust at the WTC.
They are quite long, and a bit rambling, and the second one is quite technical - so here's a brief summary about why they are of interest:
Greenyer of the MFMP is an independent research scientist trying to revive cold fushion (now better called LENR for low energy nuclear reaction) research. The "science-establishment" rejected LENR (disturbingly) based on a vote at a press conference in the 90's which was instigated by Steven Jones, now known for scholars-for-9/11-truth and for his infamous discovery of iron-rich microspheres in the WTC dust.
However LENR has so much potential for good and it really works. Many have come to believe that Jones was tasked with steering attention away from a process "someone" doesn't want the general public to know too much about, or even to believe is real.
Regarding 9/11: Jones maintained the microspheres he discovered were evidence of "super-thermite" - however Greenyer has come out now disputing this, since during his experiments (and those of others) with various LENR processes and examinations of objects affected by these processes, he constantly finds these exact same type of Iron-rich micro-spheres with the electron microscope. They are created by the LENR processes.
Greenyer strongly hypothesizes that; given Jones connection to the early "Cold Fushion" breakthrough and his role in downplaying and dismantling it, and also given his connection with the DOE and the infamous Los Alamos Labs; Jones was somehow knowledgeable of, prepared for and expected the discovery of these micro-spheres in the dust, and his claim of "super thermite" was devised by him and/or the perpetrators of 9/11 to explain them away, to create an excuse for them, and to point people away from LENR/Cold Fushion processes as their provenance and as the agent of destruction on 9/11.
There are very many pieces of circumstantial evidence and interesting info discussed;
-
such as the exacting similarity between the micropsheres Greenyer and various other experimenters are able to create in the lab, and the ones in the dust of the WTC, which at the very least indicates that their origin from the use of thermite is far from conclusive.
-
The Air force's sudden renewed interest in Ball Lightening in October of 2001, right after 9/11, when it commissioned an exhaustive report into the worldwide state of research into and experimentation with the phenomenon (the report was completed in 2003) - ball lightening is one of the processes by which LENR interacts with matter - or destroys or transmutes matter / elements. Small "ball lightenings" are created in LENR reactors, and scar the surface of metals at low temperatures.
-
The recent patents filed by Lockheed Martin for "coherent matterwave beams" which is basically Tesla's infamous "death ray", and functions in exactly the way Dr. Judy Wood's hypothesized DEW would function:
examples of applications for coherent matterwave beams may include... matterwave projectiles and missiles, directed energy weapons, matterwave optics and cloaking, matterwave emission and propulsion... etc
- Or the recent US Navy patent of a "High Frequency Gravitational Wave Generator", which could
[amplify energy] to such a degree as to generate a spacetime curvature singularity, leading to total destruction of a planetary body or planetoid
which is, again, a claim that Tesla made, saying that with his technology he could split the earth in two...
These are just a few examples. Greenyer has a lot to say about 9/11, and also about the state of occult black ops technology and how LENR may not even be so new at all, with ancient human civilizations potentially understanding it and able to make use of it to some degree.
I highly recommend watching these if you have the time. I might try to write a better summary of the main points made - in good time. I've just skimmed the surface here.