Reporter Sharyl Attkisson pretty much single-handedly destroyed the "swine flu" narrative, namely that the entire episode was a MASSIVE hoax and that the vast majority of alleged "swine flu" cases tested NEGATIVE for the so-called "H1N1" virus.
Yet, even the conspiracy theorists were diehard that THEY had the DREADED swine flu.
This taps into humanity's basic desire to be "a part" of things.
"I was sick, it must've been SWINE FLU!"
No, you fell for media hysteria and predictive programming for the COVID hoax.
"I tested "positive" for "H1N1".
No you didn't, the tests were faulty and FOIA requests revealed the "pandemic" never existed.
I'm now seeing the swine flu "faulty memory" phenomenon with COVID, but exponentially worse.
"I got COVID! I had a runny nose and couldn't taste or smell!"
The "couldn't taste or smell" is probably the most retarded talking point of all...that's LITERALLY a symptom of the common cold. You can't taste or smell if your nose is stuffed up for a week.
WTF is wrong with these people?
People want to "belong" so badly they literally convince themselves they have a disease that doesn't exist?
I can't help but see a parallel between these blinders and those from people currently trapped in COVID lockdown.
I spent many years warning Australians to GET OUT of their country while they still could. I saw Australia as being among the first to fall for the NWO.
I received STRONG pushback from even the conspiracy theorist Aussies who refused to see the forest for the trees.
I take zero joy or comfort being right.
Let's start thinking ahead.
How do we undo the damage of this fake pandemic that clearly will be with us for a century or longer?
How do we get people to realize that COVID is a hoax without causing a mass existential crisis in the population? Perhaps that's the only way to wake us from our slumber?
That is called the conflict of reason aka the conflict between those who believe that the suggestion (swine-flu) is true or false versus those who not believe that the suggestion (swine-flu) is true or false.
Notice that both sides within reason are in conflict about the same suggestion (swine-flu)...this is called division (reason) by suggestion (-ism) used by the few to control the many.
Every suggestion represents a contract between choice of suggestion and responding choice of consent; yet choice represents a reaction to balance. Therefore...to consent by choice to suggested choice represents the ignorance of using choice in reaction to balance.