Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

15
Good vs. Evil in media terms is now Conspiracy Theories vs. "Science"
posted 4 years ago by Xaviermgk 4 years ago by Xaviermgk +16 / -1

Change my mind?

2 comments share
2 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (2)
sorted by:
▲ 2 ▼
– Xaviermgk [S] 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Also, in pkvi's recent post on Juul e-cigarette sales, his link in the comments to a FOX news story had this interesting quote...

"Thursday’s action is part of a sweeping FDA review designed to bring scientific scrutiny to the multibillion-dollar vaping industry after years of delays."

They're not doing anything out of health concerns, that's for sure.

That's why they banned some products outright but allow special considerations for others.

Furthermore, I'm not well versed in the subject, but I'm pretty sure nicotine has effects that may be counter to either COVID, or even the vaccine, or both. It may even explain why they've jacked up tobacco prices across the board.

Just some thoughts.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Xaviermgk [S] 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

One corollary to this has to do with shills.

A lot of the shills transferred over from doing mainly political shilling to vaccine shilling.

The problem is...most aren't real scientists.

A great one to me was the user Isakisstherain on Reddit, a shill mainly on conspiracyundone, who tried and failed miserably to act like a researched virologist, and had the nasty habit of calling Johns Hopkins "John Hopkins", which no credible virologist would do.

Another one is the user tuchodi on here, who is an ""engineer" in a research lab", but tries to act like they have a clue about life sciences.

Favorite quote from tuchodi (who basically just attacks sources of information):

"If they have no qualifications then their opinion on the matter doesn't count for anything."

But we're supposed to listen to their opinion on matters that they have no qualifications for. OK

permalink save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - nxltw (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy