This scientist drops bombs in his (University of New Mexico, now approved) official religious exemption statement, including the Deep State’s depopulation agenda. The link to the statement (fully-scientifically referenced) is in the description of his video demonstrating how they are censoring him and potentially allowing a 3rd party to control communications between scientists at public universities. Crazy shit. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zl7I2KYvwcg
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (23)
sorted by:
Duuuude.... you should go pick up a gun at this point, see what drives your energy state. As the muslims say when being trained in fire management, 'we shoot, god decides what we hit'
And yeah, deconstructing everything I said, is in no way a counter argument to my arguments. now is it.
Energy represents the self sustaining source of ALL information and so every reaction within (flow/form) is defined by self sustenance, which for us as choice within balance, represents need over want.
Free will of choice followed by shirking responsibility over consequences, and upon closer inspection...the "we" implies acting in the name of others before choosing by free will to shoot, so already in ignorance towards self sustenance by using choice in response to balance; to instead submit (Islam) choice to suggested choice by others...just as "faith" represents.
Transmutation out of base (energy); it's what inspires me most, but I don't perceive "you" as the source, because I'm reading text on a screen.
No aka nothing implies consent to believe in suggested nothingness; which represents the choice to ignore everything (energy).
I did not consent to suggested beliefs; hence not being within the conflict of reason (argumentation about true vs false). I comprehend that nature neither offers "false" information; nor proclaims "true" information; instead it moves us; which our senses perceive as inspiration.
Suggested information from others always requires one to consent to it by free will of choice through belief; faith; submission etc. Doing so then causes the conflict of reason between believers and non-believers. This represents division by suggestion used by the few to get control over the many; by tricking them to ignore their free will of choice.
Flow doesn't offer true or false to form; only constant change; hence our need to adapt to it by choice of reaction.
Aka "at present time", yet time represents the measurement of motion; which the few subvert by suggesting the many to consent to believe in the affixed states of past; present and future, which for form within flow represent the self inflicted trauma of loss (past); hope/fear (future) and stress (present).
The ever changing moment we are in represents the moment(um) of motion aka the balance defining our reaction by choice.