Free speech is a discussion that brings out a lot of different people with a lot of different takes on it.
You have people that believe in unmitigated free speech. (this is free speech)
You have people that believe in free speech except for illegal speech, but who decides what's illegal and what's illegal constantly changes.
You have people that believe in free speech, but not violence or bigotry.
You have people that believe in free speech, but then ban anyone who they decide is a shill that posts MSM shill business.
You also have people that believe other people should only believe or write what they themselves believe, no questions asked. You see this in many countries ran by full on authoritarian governments.
Then there's the matter of private property. Should you be allowed to yell whatever you want on someone else's property, whether it be a home, a car, a business or a website. No matter what people try to convince you of, a website is private property, it is owned by someone or a corporation, they pay the bills.
Do we force private companies to pay the bills to host content that they do not want?
Also take note on this fact: Any site that has allowed very very little moderation always turns into a shit show or stormfront. There are many many many examples of this. This alone shouldn't be a problem, however, constant bigotry and aggressive insults to anyone who doesn't share those views is a very good way to chase everyone away.
Some people will say great! We don't want those faggots here! Then all you're doing is jerking each other off to the exact same ideas, which results in zero growth and mostly just a big pile of jizz on your own face.
So what is an acceptable level of free speech to everyone here?
EDIT: Woke up today banned form the Donald. Never even posted there. LOL
Definitely iffy stuff, potentially dangerous even. Freedom can be like that sometimes. I am certainly not saying advocating violence is good or should be encouraged by any means. It is shitty behavior for sure and hopefully people aren't stupid enough to commit violence because someone told them to, however if they are I do not think that laws against this speech would do much to help the situation. If we do we are then saying that the person committing the violence is less accountable for their own actions do o the fact that another person suggested he commit the violence. Should he get a lesser sentence? What punishment for the person who told him what to do, without any authority over him and without any threats if he didn't do them get?
Also, how often are these sort of situations presenting themselves? Aren't we creating the rule for the exception at that point?
This is why they got Capone for tax bullshit.
I don't have all the answers, I do know modern society is better with some rules than none, and that people should stop being assholes to each other.
Aside from that, who knows what the answer is. Too many people too full of hate, and too many people fanning those flames.
I certainly do not have all the answers but I do have most of the questions usually. lol
I wish people would stop being assholes as well and agree there is too much hate however, from what I have learned it is impossible to legislate morality even if there was an objective agreed upon moral code we all agreed on. But of course there isn't and morality is subjective for the most part and generally people believe whatever fucked up shit they do is moral anyhow so it wouldn't help. BLM, antifa, proud boys or the KKK there is not one of them who doesn't believe in their cause and knows they are playing the role of the villain or that their actions aren't justified given the evils of the opposing side to their cause.
I am not sure if society is better with some rules regarding speech to be honest. And we have more laws on the books than we could possibly know in this modern society and look at the shape we are in. Maybe these laws aren't helping the situation and more freedom would stop many of the conflicts out there.
Indeed. But some causes are better than others, causes that help people > causes that hang people.
And yes, there is a middle ground somewhere with laws, too many is as bad as too few (people are fucking animals and sorry, but they need some rules or it's just a zoo), the problem is that no 2 people will ever agree on all the same laws.