So would they stand to gain from increased Ivermectin sales? Or is there any reason to care about their motives when they're actively pushing back against censorship?
Not everyone who has capital or manages influential firms is a crook, not saying that they aren't but I see nothing substantial that indicates so. Even if they were to make bank on Ivermectin.
The questions of interest here are:
Does Ivermectin work?
Are they pushing back against censorship and corruption?
If the answer is yes, then who gives a shit if they make money in the process.
So would they stand to gain from increased Ivermectin sales? Or is there any reason to care about their motives when they're actively pushing back against censorship?
Not everyone who has capital or manages influential firms is a crook, not saying that they aren't but I see nothing substantial that indicates so. Even if they were to make bank on Ivermectin.
The questions of interest here are: Does Ivermectin work? Are they pushing back against censorship and corruption?
If the answer is yes, then who gives a shit if they make money in the process.