10
Comments (8)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
0
Obeisiak [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

Do you even know what peer review is and how it is done?

nOt EvEn PeEr ReViEwEd

peer review is literally just a sign of approval from government picked scientists from universities. If your paper goes against the main narrative, then you dont even get peer reviewed. I actually work at an university and have reviewed quite some papers.

another example, wich you, my fellow german, should know, is Michael Schrappes hospital situation report. Its scientific method was flawless and noone could bring up arguments why the data is wrong or misinterpreted, so they simply denounced him.

0
ZyklonBen 0 points ago +1 / -1

peer review is literally just a sign of approval from government picked scientists from universities.

This is the dumbest and most ignorant bullshit I have read in a while and I lurk here quite a bit.

Educate yourself you stupid idiot.

1
Obeisiak [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

MSc in physics working on a doctorate at the moment. I think thats enough to have an opinion about peer review.

0
ZyklonBen 0 points ago +1 / -1

Oh great. Please provide a fucking source for your ridiculous claim then. How exactly does the government control the peer review process?

How do they force scientific journals to choose specific reviewers?