We’ve known ivermectin works for over a year. I remember reading papers proving clinical success against covid last august which means it’s been used for treatment for at least 16 mo. They use it in India with great success.
Caution: Preprints are preliminary reports of work that have not been certified by peer review. They should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Do you even know what peer review is and how it is done?
nOt EvEn PeEr ReViEwEd
peer review is literally just a sign of approval from government picked scientists from universities. If your paper goes against the main narrative, then you dont even get peer reviewed. I actually work at an university and have reviewed quite some papers.
another example, wich you, my fellow german, should know, is Michael Schrappes hospital situation report. Its scientific method was flawless and noone could bring up arguments why the data is wrong or misinterpreted, so they simply denounced him.
Link to the paper: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.03.26.21254377v1.full.pdf
We’ve known ivermectin works for over a year. I remember reading papers proving clinical success against covid last august which means it’s been used for treatment for at least 16 mo. They use it in India with great success.
The deaths are faked. Place the yellow line flat onto the blue line and you get the big picture.
Kek
Fucking sheep
Do you even know what peer review is and how it is done?
peer review is literally just a sign of approval from government picked scientists from universities. If your paper goes against the main narrative, then you dont even get peer reviewed. I actually work at an university and have reviewed quite some papers.
another example, wich you, my fellow german, should know, is Michael Schrappes hospital situation report. Its scientific method was flawless and noone could bring up arguments why the data is wrong or misinterpreted, so they simply denounced him.
This is the dumbest and most ignorant bullshit I have read in a while and I lurk here quite a bit.
Educate yourself you stupid idiot.
MSc in physics working on a doctorate at the moment. I think thats enough to have an opinion about peer review.
Oh great. Please provide a fucking source for your ridiculous claim then. How exactly does the government control the peer review process?
How do they force scientific journals to choose specific reviewers?