Robert O Young exposed as a fraud. Stew Peters pushed disinfo again.
(media.communities.win)
Comments (5)
sorted by:
Well at this point i don’t care whose work it is, as long as the underlying information is correct.
They can find the rest out later, we got bigger issues to deal with.
Let's say you share it with family and friends, then they look into it and find Dr. Robert Young was sued for millions for practicing medicine without a license and lost. Then they find out Dr. Campra is calling him out for passing Campra's work as his own original findings. Not a good look.
Uh, so did Dr. Young do his own experiments or copy the data, that's the real question. However, this is an important question. If he just copied it and presented it, we lose valuable verification.
I really hope that he did, and didn't just duplicate the work. It's perfectly normal to have another study to validate the original. That's not plagiarism, it's peer review/verification and is a normal part of the scientific review process.
I agree with DrunkT - doesn't matter who did it, as long as it's the truth. Facts don't care about being copyrighted or copied, they're still either true or false regardless.