Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

8
Robert O Young exposed as a fraud. Stew Peters pushed disinfo again. (media.communities.win)
posted 4 years ago by TurnToGodNow 4 years ago by TurnToGodNow +8 / -0
5 comments download share
5 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
Comments (5)
sorted by:
▲ 4 ▼
– DrunkT 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

Well at this point i don’t care whose work it is, as long as the underlying information is correct.

They can find the rest out later, we got bigger issues to deal with.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– TurnToGodNow [S] 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Let's say you share it with family and friends, then they look into it and find Dr. Robert Young was sued for millions for practicing medicine without a license and lost. Then they find out Dr. Campra is calling him out for passing Campra's work as his own original findings. Not a good look.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– infinite-ohm 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Uh, so did Dr. Young do his own experiments or copy the data, that's the real question. However, this is an important question. If he just copied it and presented it, we lose valuable verification.

I really hope that he did, and didn't just duplicate the work. It's perfectly normal to have another study to validate the original. That's not plagiarism, it's peer review/verification and is a normal part of the scientific review process.

I agree with DrunkT - doesn't matter who did it, as long as it's the truth. Facts don't care about being copyrighted or copied, they're still either true or false regardless.

permalink save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - lf7fw (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy