Covid is pneumonia, it's not new. The definition of "covid" is "atypical pneumonia". The "atypical" part indicates the pneumonia is caused by an "unknown" or "novel" pathogen, that they say they have no specific treatment for. Typical pneumonias have treatment protocols already set.
They say they have a test that can pick up this new pathogen, they gave it the name SARSCOV2, and then call you a "covid sufferer" if you test "positive", regardless if you're sick or not.
The problem is the test is triggered "positive" by a number of different molecules or "viruses". It can't distinguish between the "influenza virus" and the "corona virus" for example. It also has a high rate of false positives, potentially extremely high, depending on how it's done. It is generally done in the way that produces the most false positives, seemingly intentionally, since this aspect is well known and was even mentioned by Fauci last Summer.
However, if you are suffering from pneumonia, it is still pneumonia, no matter what it was caused by. If you get pneumonia, it's serious. It can kill and is often difficult to cure and treat, even before the invention of covid, and especially in older, unhealthy (for whatever reason) people.
Maybe Q is also real?
Is there a reason why you replied 9 different times to this post?
Is the sock puppet software not working?
To bump the thread up because I wanna see some responses
What does GA.win say about that?
Maybe the aliens did not warn Simon Parkes in time?
Where are your CIA pals when you need them?
What does smiling Charlie Ward say now?
Wow.
So.....Covid exists?
Covid is pneumonia, it's not new. The definition of "covid" is "atypical pneumonia". The "atypical" part indicates the pneumonia is caused by an "unknown" or "novel" pathogen, that they say they have no specific treatment for. Typical pneumonias have treatment protocols already set.
They say they have a test that can pick up this new pathogen, they gave it the name SARSCOV2, and then call you a "covid sufferer" if you test "positive", regardless if you're sick or not.
The problem is the test is triggered "positive" by a number of different molecules or "viruses". It can't distinguish between the "influenza virus" and the "corona virus" for example. It also has a high rate of false positives, potentially extremely high, depending on how it's done. It is generally done in the way that produces the most false positives, seemingly intentionally, since this aspect is well known and was even mentioned by Fauci last Summer.
However, if you are suffering from pneumonia, it is still pneumonia, no matter what it was caused by. If you get pneumonia, it's serious. It can kill and is often difficult to cure and treat, even before the invention of covid, and especially in older, unhealthy (for whatever reason) people.
Steele was 69 and not the healthiest looking guy.
Maybe we should all wear a mask?
Is this why Trump urges all to get vaxxed?
Maybe Delta variant is truly dangerous?
That's old news. The new shit is C2.1. Came out of Peru in May, 2021.