So I came upon this video on YouTube from 2018, where Stuart Hameroff, Professor of Anesthesiology and Psychology. I know a lot of it is pretty deep and full of jargon, but stay with me. He essentially makes an argument, based on experiments with anesthesia, that consciousness is mediated by quantum vibrations in the tubulin microtubules inside neurons.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VG8_hlnFdWM

Now take the rumor that the recent vaccines have been alleged to contain graphene (a superconductor under certain conditions), and the fact that all the vaccines have to be kept cold-- almost as if they're trying to prevent quantum decoherence.

Imagine you're big pharma/deep state, and you've got the ability to quantum-entangle macroscopic matter. You keep one set of quantum particles plugged into your quantum supercomputer, and you send the linked set of quantum particles out into the world.

Here's were the vax comes in. Could it be certain vaccine ingredients are quantum entangled molecules? Could these molecules be designed in such a way that they bind to the tubulin in neurons, but in such a way that they allow most normal activity to pass through, forming a sort of one-way or two-way surveillance layer? You're still conscious, and you feel "normal," but the signal of every firing neuron is being sent to big brother. Maybe bad thoughts can be pruned away. Maybe good thoughts can be rewarded. Most people spend hours a day on their cell phone, essentially training the algorithm to interpret the signals coming from their neuronal activity.

Now think about the evidence that several anti-worm drugs are known to act by binding to the colchicine site of beta-tubulin in worms and other lower organisms. Could it be that the anti-parasitic ivermectin does the same thing-- disrupting the tubulin binding site. This would explain why the vax enforcers are so adamant against ivermectin.

Beta-tubulin also plays an important role in the formation of platelets. Maybe a quickly-developed quantum-entangled nanoparticle designed to fit into the beta-tubulin receptor is going to have some adverse side effects on the beta-tubulin sites in platelets, affecting their shape and function. Blood clots, anyone?

I think we need to start pondering theories and following the rabbit holes. Lots of sci-fi sounding advancements have happened in the last decade, and we know that "they" are decades ahead of anything we know. Just wanted to drop a few breadcrumbs.