That's because they accepted the base premise as true, that it's safe, effective and free. Neither of those 3 things are true. They're starting in the middle, or towards the end.
If they start at the very very beginning, using first principles, where we start from: this is an experimental drug, we need to see the side effects, and then look at VAERS and see the number of death and permanent disabled, and then compare that to other vaccines from the past, they'd think otherwise.
In the past they removed certain vaccines that only had 25-50 deaths. VAERS today shows over 13,000 deaths, and it's supposedly under-reported by 10x-100x!
Now, if you listen to both Faux News and CCN you might be able to read between the li(n)es and figure out the truth. But then you'd still miss the whole truth as both sides censor things that are critical because they're both censored by the same TLAs.
That's because they accepted the base premise as true, that it's safe, effective and free. Neither of those 3 things are true. They're starting in the middle, or towards the end.
If they start at the very very beginning, using first principles, where we start from: this is an experimental drug, we need to see the side effects, and then look at VAERS and see the number of death and permanent disabled, and then compare that to other vaccines from the past, they'd think otherwise.
In the past they removed certain vaccines that only had 25-50 deaths. VAERS today shows over 13,000 deaths, and it's supposedly under-reported by 10x-100x!
Now, if you listen to both Faux News and CCN you might be able to read between the li(n)es and figure out the truth. But then you'd still miss the whole truth as both sides censor things that are critical because they're both censored by the same TLAs.