btw, no one says he won the case...in the original video he says he "lost" over legal semantics...it's the bigger picture of REQUIRING proof of the virus.
They avoided getting caught with their pants down by doing the whole "process errors" thing.
The case is still important, but I recognize the nuance can be lost in this sea of disinformation.
btw, no one says he won the case...in the original video he says he "lost" over legal semantics...it's the bigger picture of REQUIRING proof of the virus.
They avoided getting caught with their pants down by doing the whole "process errors" thing.
The case is still important, but I recognize the nuance can be lost in this sea of disinformation.