So, for this post i will just let my mind flow free to analytically sketch (and afterwards discuss with you guys) the consequences of covid being a hoax, plandemic. For this i will assume that the following premise is true:

The SARS-COV-2 virus and the Covid-19 pandemic is not real and a construct by powerful people to further their agenda.

Note that this assumption is not making any statement on what they want to achieve with this, it clearly states that the "invisible enemy" - the boogeyman - is not real.

Now, how do we prove something is not real? A popular example for that would be religion and god: Can you prove that god is not real? Can you prove god is real?

There have been many scholars in history that tried to prove or disprove god, but they all failed. They were formulated about 1000 years in the past by very intelligent people that formulated the foundation of todays mathematics and philosophy. There are even multiple different ways of trying to prove the existence of god, ontological, kosmological, teleological etc... if you are further interested in these proofs, i recommend you reading the wikipedia article (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existence_of_God).

now while these proofs all have their own beauty, be it mathematical, logical or argumentative, they all lack the same: conclusivity. This problem is buried deep in the construct that humans built to understand nature and argue logcally, as they all use argumentum ad ignorantuam. This means they appeal to ignorance or rather to a "lack of contrary evidence".

we see exactly the same in regards to SARS-COV-2, where almost all the arguments being made are based on a whacky framework of a sequenced RNA by one single scientist (from china btw), an unisolated form of the virus, PCR tests that cant distinguish common viruses from the SARS-COV-2 viruses, PCR tests that cant distinguish between virus variants and statistical anomalies like the abundance of influenza cases, deaths due to heart attacks or similar things since 2020. almost everyone that died in this timeframe was labeled as "Covid-19 positive" and thus was solely counted towards the covid statistics. the lockdowns were decided on absolute numbers that were not normalized towards the amount of people living in the area nor towards the amount of tests that were done. using absolute numbers is deliberately blowing stuff out of proportion, here some examples:

India reports more than 2,000 COVID-19 deaths in single day https://www.reuters.com/world/india/india-reports-more-than-2000-covid-19-deaths-single-day-2021-04-21/

or

The United States suffered several waves of COVID-19 with a total of 617,427 lives lost since early 2020. At the peak of the U.S. epidemic in January 2021, over 3,300 people died on average each day. A total of 36,230,665 cases have been reported, according to a Reuters analysis of state and county data. https://graphics.reuters.com/HEALTH-CORONAVIRUS/USA-TRENDS/dgkvlgkrkpb/

now this seems like A LOT if we think about it. 2000 deaths per day??? holy shit did the nazis build camps in india?

now lets do some math: india has a population of 1.380.004.385 (onebillionthreehundredmillionfourthousandthreehundredeightyfive). to put the amount of deaths into perspective of the total amount of people living in india, we divide one by the other and call it the relative deathcount.

D_r = 2000/1.380.004.385 = 0.00000145

in other words: every day a fraction of 0.00000145 of the population died. in contrary to this: EVERY HOUR THERE ARE ~3240 BIRTHS IN INDIA (https://countrymeters.info/en/India). To get from the relative deathrate to the percentage of people dying per day, you have to multiply by one hundred. So we get a 0.000145% of deaths per day. NOW we can compare and for comparison we will look at germany. I deliberately chose germany because of its good free healthcare and social system and also because of the much lower population density compared to india.

germans data can be found here: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/germany/#graph-deaths-daily

note that these numbers are not updated and reported daily by every institution, thus the graphs have these immense spikes and troughs. anyways we will go with the numbers reported, as we dont want anyone to be able to accuse us of altering data. on 21st april, the day the reuters article reported about indias deaths, germany had ~300 deaths on that day. germanys population is 83.000.000 (eightythreemillion), thus we do our math to get to the relative deathcount:

D_r = 300/83.000.000 = 0.00000361

Uh, what's that? There are relatively more than twice as many deaths per day in Germany than in India? Why didn't Reuters report about that? Because 2000 seems much more dramatic and dangerous than 300. Now lets look at america, april 21st 2021 a deathcount of 854 (see Reuters article above) with a total population of 328.200.000 (threehundredtwentyeightmilliontwohundredthousand).

D_r = 854/328.200.000 = 0.00000260

Now why am I writing all this down? Because this is an information war. The information is out there, but everywhere I look I see absolute numbers. Compare the following statements:

In Germany 3,768,148 were infected with SARS-COV-2 and 92,348 of those died.

and

In Germany 4.5% of the population were infected with SARS-COV-2 and 2.4% of those died.

Even with the earlier mentioned inflation of numbers due to statistically insignificant PCR tests, and thus everyone dying being counted as SARS-COV-2 positive, this is laughable.

now to get back on topic: The consequences of this will be, that first of all the average citizen after the covid-disclosure will know A LOT more about statistics and how to put numbers and information into proportion. It will be similar to the schools teaching about the holocaust, where the students have their morals and ethics questioned from early age on to mold them into anti-facists. We can already see this now, where every average joe starts reading up on mathematical knowledge to interprete statistics and make their own judgemend. be id in regard to the 2020 election or the covid pandemic, it is happening.

the next consequence will be that governments will be in eternal distrust. noone will every listen to career-politicians, that literally learned about manipulating masses at college and in their professional life. peoples threshold to protest will be much MUCH lower.

also the transparency will be a big issue. as soon as some journalist or science will back some companies product, people will ask "who funded that journalist/science?". nowadays this is all behind closed curtains and as we have seen here (https://conspiracies.win/p/12jcmB3SHJ/we-are-now-officially-dealing-wi/) the whole complex of science - validation - confirmation - industry - sales - product distribution are interconnected and backing each others results to sell their products. the lobbyism of any industry will have to be revealed AND will be seen as corruption. my personal opinion on this has always been that lobbyism is legal corruption for corporations.

the next thing i imagine to happen is science being discarded, because it is either funded by the government to generate certain results and have scientific backing for their decisions or it is funded by corporations to back their product. currently there is little to no INDEPENDENT science and since independent science doesn't really pay we will go back to the state of some hundred years ago, where only the noble and aristocrats were able to do research, as they didnt had to worry about other things. but maybe as part of the new schoolprograms teaching much more about statistics, information and transperancy, the average joe will be able to do own research, as science is literally nothing else but measurements and their statistical interpretations in regard to proving or disproving a premise.

also besides science, practical medicine will have to do a lot of justification. why do we have to sign a clause that frees the doctor and the medicine manufacturer from all responsibilities? why do we have so many drugs that are kept behind prescriptions that we only get by visiting and paying a doctor? for example: in germany you cant get ivermectin or HCQ without prescriptions, good luck self medicating or practicing prophylaxis.

I doubt the population will be split into "dissidents" and "bootlickers" after disclosure, as the "dissidents" already know the "bootlickers" were subverted and manipulated by the institutions they trusted in. the "awakening" of "bootlickers" will hit them much harder than the "dissidents". they will probably feel ashamed and embarrassed.

We might have something similar to the nuremberg trials again, where people are being held responsible.

lets discuss further consequences or challenge my views on this!