No. He risked his life and lost everything to let the world know what he knew was happening. The U.S. government wants you to believe he's fake for sure. Of course they have a smear campaign for him.
Sure. We have a difference of opinion. Just read what Snowden released and ask yourself why on earth the U.S. government would want that and what possible purpose could it serve to have some CIA actor go to live in exile.
I have seen this sort of stock answer probably hundreds of times over the years on various deep politics venues. The idea is that the more cynical user is more knowledgeable and accurate which terminates the thoughts of a surprising number of people.
The ending of George Orwell's Animal Farm has nothing to do with Edward Snowden.
I got this clip where he bashes Trump and practically praises Obama.
Notice how he's treated by the media. How articles characterize him.
Compare to how they treated Assange before the backlash. Or how they treat most legitimate whistle-blowers.
That's a strong giveaway to me.
Speculative wise... They say the NSA was gathering Intel on CIA and Snowden was used to take them down a peg. Maybe not everyone at the NSA was happy with Obama?
NSA Dir. Michael Rogers did meet with Trump behind Obamas back and Trump certainly acted like he had proof Obama was spying on him.
The media hated Roger's after that.
Things have seemed tense between the NSA and the establishment Post Snowden.
No. He risked his life and lost everything to let the world know what he knew was happening. The U.S. government wants you to believe he's fake for sure. Of course they have a smear campaign for him.
The government creates lots of disinformation that appears to be from independent sources. YouTube, forums, you name it. You are being duped.
Sure. We have a difference of opinion. Just read what Snowden released and ask yourself why on earth the U.S. government would want that and what possible purpose could it serve to have some CIA actor go to live in exile.
I have seen this sort of stock answer probably hundreds of times over the years on various deep politics venues. The idea is that the more cynical user is more knowledgeable and accurate which terminates the thoughts of a surprising number of people.
The ending of George Orwell's Animal Farm has nothing to do with Edward Snowden.
Snowden is a good psyop. Fuck that "whistle blower"
Lol'd at Edward Snowden because I completely believe it;
First county he fled too; China. Before you "but its Hong-Kong" he leaked US secrets to China while he was there.
Was just recently pushing Climate Change via Twitter.
Is allowed on twitter, for that matter.
What else we got on him out there?
Hey. Good stuff.
I got this clip where he bashes Trump and practically praises Obama.
Notice how he's treated by the media. How articles characterize him.
Compare to how they treated Assange before the backlash. Or how they treat most legitimate whistle-blowers.
That's a strong giveaway to me.
Speculative wise... They say the NSA was gathering Intel on CIA and Snowden was used to take them down a peg. Maybe not everyone at the NSA was happy with Obama?
NSA Dir. Michael Rogers did meet with Trump behind Obamas back and Trump certainly acted like he had proof Obama was spying on him.
The media hated Roger's after that.
Things have seemed tense between the NSA and the establishment Post Snowden.
Forums are full of sockpuppets trying to discredit Edward Snowden.