AN'IMAL, noun [Latin animal from anima, air, breath, soul.] Animation implies communication from flow to form aka flow animates form; while form responses to flow aka adaptation.
Your consent to believe talking representing reasoning (conflict between true vs false) is the issue.
as though you had something profound to say.
Eye of the beholder aka ONEs free will of choice evaluates ALL predefined value, but not to define value by evaluation; but to balance through choice as form within flow.
Your consent to believe talking representing reasoning (conflict between true vs false)
I never said any such thing. You're spouting horrible made-up nonsense with no basis whatsoever, as always. At least this time it's intelligible, instead of gibberish.
You're doing it again...a true versus false conflict of reason. When you suggest words you proclaim them to be truth or false to others; who then are faced with choosing a side within the conflict of reason.
Nature doesn't offer false information, and neither does it brand true information. Someone suggested you to believe the meaning of a word, and you consented to believe it to be true; like "animal".
I pointed out AN'IMAL, noun [Latin animal from anima, air, breath, soul.] to show the contradiction to what you consent to believe it means; what it denotes and then put it into the perspective of my own comprehension of flow/form.
nonsense
Aka "no sense"; yet as form (life) within flow (inception towards death) each form needs to get input by flow; hence sensing movement. "no" also implies your consent to believe in nothingness; which also doesn't exist within flow/form (energy).
made-up
This implies your consent to believe in suggested creationism aka creation out of nothing. As form within flow we cannot create "new"; we respond to ALL that already is; so it's not creation; but transmutation out of base (energy), hence form being shaped out of flow.
The parasites are suggesting us to believe in creation; so that we stay in ignorance of transmutation. Try to form a "new" thought; without using the inspiration from ALL that already is?
no basis
Energy aka flow (loss) to form (growth) causing us to represent ONE temporary potential within ALL ongoing potentiality. You lack comprehension of energy representing ALL aka everything; because you consent to believe in "no" aka nothingness.
this time
Time measures movement; yet within movement there's no such thing as affixed states (past; present, future). Suggesting you to believe that it does; deceives you to consent to self inflicted trauma aka loss (past); stress (present) and hope/fear (future). All of these traumas are then endlessly suggested to you by our parasites to keep you in ignorance b corrupting your comprehension.
Take your most severe loss; stress, hope or fear, go outside to the nearest other life-form in the vicinity and ask yourself...why are we sharing a habitat; yet I'm the only one being traumatized mentally by what I consent to believe in?
At least this time it's intelligible, instead of gibberish.
INTEL'LIGENCE, noun [Latin intelligentia, from intelligent, to understand.] What are the implications of you judging what you don't comprehend as gibberish coming from others? Adaptation to perception is what builds comprehension; yet you're tricked to blame perception for your own lack of comprehension.
Ignorance? You're the one asking why animals don't talk, as though you had something profound to say.
ONEs choice of want over need within ALL.
AN'IMAL, noun [Latin animal from anima, air, breath, soul.] Animation implies communication from flow to form aka flow animates form; while form responses to flow aka adaptation.
Your consent to believe talking representing reasoning (conflict between true vs false) is the issue.
Eye of the beholder aka ONEs free will of choice evaluates ALL predefined value, but not to define value by evaluation; but to balance through choice as form within flow.
I never said any such thing. You're spouting horrible made-up nonsense with no basis whatsoever, as always. At least this time it's intelligible, instead of gibberish.
You're doing it again...a true versus false conflict of reason. When you suggest words you proclaim them to be truth or false to others; who then are faced with choosing a side within the conflict of reason.
Nature doesn't offer false information, and neither does it brand true information. Someone suggested you to believe the meaning of a word, and you consented to believe it to be true; like "animal".
I pointed out AN'IMAL, noun [Latin animal from anima, air, breath, soul.] to show the contradiction to what you consent to believe it means; what it denotes and then put it into the perspective of my own comprehension of flow/form.
Aka "no sense"; yet as form (life) within flow (inception towards death) each form needs to get input by flow; hence sensing movement. "no" also implies your consent to believe in nothingness; which also doesn't exist within flow/form (energy).
This implies your consent to believe in suggested creationism aka creation out of nothing. As form within flow we cannot create "new"; we respond to ALL that already is; so it's not creation; but transmutation out of base (energy), hence form being shaped out of flow.
The parasites are suggesting us to believe in creation; so that we stay in ignorance of transmutation. Try to form a "new" thought; without using the inspiration from ALL that already is?
Energy aka flow (loss) to form (growth) causing us to represent ONE temporary potential within ALL ongoing potentiality. You lack comprehension of energy representing ALL aka everything; because you consent to believe in "no" aka nothingness.
Time measures movement; yet within movement there's no such thing as affixed states (past; present, future). Suggesting you to believe that it does; deceives you to consent to self inflicted trauma aka loss (past); stress (present) and hope/fear (future). All of these traumas are then endlessly suggested to you by our parasites to keep you in ignorance b corrupting your comprehension.
Take your most severe loss; stress, hope or fear, go outside to the nearest other life-form in the vicinity and ask yourself...why are we sharing a habitat; yet I'm the only one being traumatized mentally by what I consent to believe in?
INTEL'LIGENCE, noun [Latin intelligentia, from intelligent, to understand.] What are the implications of you judging what you don't comprehend as gibberish coming from others? Adaptation to perception is what builds comprehension; yet you're tricked to blame perception for your own lack of comprehension.
That's not the way language works.
Words mean things.
Until someone blasts that much through your head you are hopelessly confined to gibberish.