Apparently. "Listening" was the word you used. I thought it meant you knew what he was saying when you vouched for the value of what he said. I guess not.
I can't see much point in carrying this on given you're willing to value someone's input while claiming you didn't actually know what they said.
See, you think I "value" that input. It's called "listening" without making a determination as to value. And then you said that I didn't "know what they said", which is silly. You think "listen" means heed. You don't have a grip on language.
Anything you say I can confidently say has zero value. That's a fact. Buh bye now.
You are misinterpreting "listen".
But that's standard for you.
Apparently. "Listening" was the word you used. I thought it meant you knew what he was saying when you vouched for the value of what he said. I guess not.
I can't see much point in carrying this on given you're willing to value someone's input while claiming you didn't actually know what they said.
Last word to you, if you want it.
See, you think I "value" that input. It's called "listening" without making a determination as to value. And then you said that I didn't "know what they said", which is silly. You think "listen" means heed. You don't have a grip on language.
Anything you say I can confidently say has zero value. That's a fact. Buh bye now.