/No - it's broken down into fructose and glucose, which do enter the brain.
And glucose is main fuel for brain. Regardless of the way it obtained. Things necessary for brain to work can't be "addictive".
Are you trying to claim the whole sugar molecule doesn't enter the brain therefore those studies are debunked?
Yes. It does not enter, so it can't interfere with pleasure center bypassing normal processes of feeling pleasure like cocaine do. Sugar is tasty, so it is pleasant, just like any other pleasant foods and things. There is nothing unnatural in it.
It's not the body's fault for a bad diet just as it's not the lung's fault for the person smoking cigarettes.
Nicotine and food is completely different things. Like sugar and cocaine.
You can avoid them today: whole foods are available at the super market
That "whole foods" from supermarket usually just the same garbage with another sticker. Only raw things like sugar, salt, grain, flour and may be pasta worth attention in supermarkets if you looking for food without unnatural additions. For everything else try local farmer markets, or grow your own.
And glucose is main fuel for brain. Regardless of the way it obtained. Things necessary for brain to work can't be "addictive".
Yes. It does not enter, so it can't interfere with pleasure center bypassing normal processes of feeling pleasure like cocaine do. Sugar is tasty, so it is pleasant, just like any other pleasant foods and things. There is nothing unnatural in it.
Nicotine and food is completely different things. Like sugar and cocaine.
That "whole foods" from supermarket usually just the same garbage with another sticker. Only raw things like sugar, salt, grain, flour and may be pasta worth attention in supermarkets if you looking for food without unnatural additions. For everything else try local farmer markets, or grow your own.