The reason people don’t believe in Bigfoot is not so much the lying and the cover-up that the government is doing, it’s the brainwashing they did to us in school.
They told us that all eye-witness accounts are just anecdotes and not to be believed. So when a close friend or family member tells you that they saw a UFO, Bigfoot or a ghost; you are supposed to laugh at them and call them an idiot. Or you might accuse your healthy, non-drug using friend or family member of experiencing sudden hallucinations.
We are taught to trust authority rather than our relatives. Example: Your grandfather is sitting there on his deathbed and at the last minute he says “Hey, I need to tell everyone something. 30 years ago while I was hunting I saw a bigfoot from 10 feet away. I never talked about it because I didn’t want to be laughed at.”
We were taught to assume that grandfather is either senile or just joking. That’s what everybody does with their last breath, just make up a stupid story to fuck with their kids, right? And besides his story is just an anecdote, right?
Here’s the thing, in a court of law, anecdotes are legal evidence. If you walk across the street and shoot your neighbor and two or three of your other neighbors witness that shooting, you are going to go to jail. Even if you manage get rid of the gun and gloves that you used, that witness testimony is enough to get you executed by the state. Even without photo or video evidence of your crime, those sworn “anecdotes” can convict you.
But when 10,000 people a year report UFOs, we are taught to reject or discount each and every one of those anecdotes.
Oh, but guess what, the U.S. Navy now says that UFOs are real. So, I guess that means at least a few of those thousands of people weren’t lying or wrong about what they saw, were they?
OK, so now how about those 30,000 people who have had Bigfoot encounters. Is each and everyone of those people lying or wrong?
If you answer “yes”, you’re just admitted that you’re fucking brainwashed.
Why are we waiting for authorities to tell us the truth about the world?
Talk to people and look around, the truth is out there.
Ignoring the novel you wrote and just responding to the title: Bigfoot I have heard at least one first hand account, person said it was fast, real fast, and you could hear it's it running it shook the whole ground made a booming sound, Seen while hunting with family, scared his grandfather so bad he hasn't been in the woods since and he'd been a lifelong hunter.
Sounds like another credible Bigfoot anecdote.
But we’re not allowed to believe that Bigfoot exists until someone from Harvard tells us they exist.
Indeed. This is not the place honestly I haven't posted here much it's kind of trash on the conspiracy front mostly right wing fear porn peddled. Quite lame. Here's an interesting video to check out on bigfoot and other mythical/legendary realm dwellers. It's a good channel lots of interesting topics https://youtu.be/8PpOMBhhWfA
Thousands of people have Bigfoot experiences every single year.
Some of those incidents are reported and you can hear a lot of them on various Bigfoot channels on YouTube but I’m betting that the majority of witnesses don’t talk about it because they don’t want to be ridiculed.
There are crap tons of photos of the end videos of UFOs right? Of course for you the quality of those photos or video was not good enough and you’re assumed that most of them were produced with Photoshop anyway, correct? So it’s very likely that in the recent past you did not believe in UFOs, you doubted all the witnesses to UFO photos and felt that the evidence was not strong enough, correct?
What’s that? The U.S. Navy says that UFOs are un-identifiable objects in with no known origin?
Oh, so now maybe some of those blurry pictures may have been real, right?
There are a crap ton of photos of Bigfoot, but the mass media usually doesn’t publish them.
Have you seen the most famous film of Bigfoot, the Patterson-Gimli film? It is a color film from the late 60’s taken by two cowboys. That film is very credible except for the fact that it seems to support the hypothesis that Bigfoot is more of a gorilla type animal. I am one of the few people who think that the film could be disinformation. But just because I think one famous film is disinformation doesn’t mean that all I think that all the other evidence is moot.
Of course if you looked up all of the videos or photos, you would say that they were all too blurry or that they were faked, correct? In fact some of the photos are fake. There are a few losers out there who are after money or attention. And some of the photos are faked on purpose and put out as disinformation in order to create the idea that all the photos are fake.
But see here’s what you have to do: You have to prove that 100% of the witnesses are wrong and that 100% of the physical evidence is fake. ONLY proving that 90% of the witnesses are wrong or that only 90% of the evidence is fake proves that Bigfoot is real.
If 10% of the witnesses are telling the truth and 10% of the foot prints are real and 10% of the big foot hair is real and 10% of the photos are not photoshopped fakes, well them, that proves that Bigfoot is real and that some people have been trying to cover it up with disinformation.
Oh and in the cases where people don’t take photos of Bigfoot, there’s a reason for that. Before or during many non-visual encounters where people hear the howls or the footsteps of Bigfoot, people describing how they felt they were being watched. Maybe for the first time in their lives, those people are experiencing their sixth sense. Most humans aren’t connected to the sixth sense but from all the anecdotes I’ve heard, it seems like Bigfoot have full control over their sixth sense and so they have the ability to project fear into humans.
Many Bigfoot encounters involve people experiencing the greatest amount of fear in their life whether they actually witness Bigfoot clearly or not. In those instances where people actually see a Bigfoot, they are feeling so much fear that they either forget to or are unable to take out their cameras or smart phones because they’re too busy literally crapping their pants and running away.
You know, if I’m just some dip-shit making up a Bigfoot encounter story to get attention, it’s going to end with me using my kung fu skills to beat up the Bigfoot so badly that it runs away from me. I’m not gonna make up a story where I heard some footsteps, saw a Bigfoot’s shadow, crapped my pants and then ran back to my car. I don’t look so heroic in that story, do I? But there’s a crap ton of stories like that.
UFO equals unidentified flying object.
In the past, when regular people claim to have seen a UFO, experts tried to explain that every object that was seen could be identified. Thus, unidentified flying objects were said to not exist and anyone who claimed to see them was either an idiot or a liar.
The US military is now explaining that the objects that it sees cannot be identified. They have stated that these objects do not come from the regular US military. Many experts have gone on to say that these objects cannot be not from China or Russia.
Just the fact that the military is admitting that these objects are truly unidentified is a big step.
So, these objects either come from a hidden advanced human civilization here on earth or they are from off world. Or, more likely, both.
Either one of these options would be a huge admittance of the truth.
In any case, the government admitting these things exist means that many of the people who claim to have experienced UFOs in the past did experience the same actual unidentified flying objects.
Now it is very possible that some of these UFOs come from black projects that the standard military has no access to. Then the question becomes how did the people in the black projects develop these highly advanced energy and propulsion technologies without any of us knowing about it.
Did the people running black projects get intentional or unintentional help from extraterrestrials? This question is no longer outside the realm of possibility given all of the black project witnesses we have seen from the Steven Greer group. The problem is separating all the information produced by disinformation agents from all the legitimate information out there.
Finally disinformation doesn’t discredit all real information. In fact, disinformation is proof that someone is trying to hide something.
Excellent breakdown, op. I've long observed this conditioning regarding the supernatural and unexplained but never has someone explained it so well. Very good point regarding "anecdotes" as admissable and sometimes damning evidence in court.
Regarding bigfoot, I went hiking in the summer in southern Vermont a decade ago. At the bottom of the hill near the entrance was a sign warning hikers of reported bigfoot activity. It said to not wander of the trail and to be observant.
At the time, I noted the warning but carried on solo. Went blueberry picking off the trail, wandered up the boulder fields, which Missing 411 enthusiasts will recognize as a bad idea.
I haven’t watched cable TV or cable news in years.
That’s maybe why I have been able to reconnect to my common sense.
The extent to which all of us have been programmed by entertainment, mass media and state education is massive.
However I’m happy to see that sometime all you need is some simple logic to defeat some of this programming.
Bigfoot is real because I seen one and I have friends that have.ailiens are bullshit
I guess when the government comes out and admits that extraterrestrials exist, then will know for sure that they don’t exist.
Lol…
First of all UFO == alien. Look at DARPA & realize that the government lies nonstop & has technology 30 years before the public. Exotic technologies aren't difficult to fathom.
One of my best friends claims to have seen bigfoot. Claims it couldn't have been a bear (my thought) because of speed... how many people know for sure how fast a bear can run?
My problem with the bigfoot thing is two fold: 1) what would it change? Ok, let's just assume there's a really rare biped mammal running around. Why do you care? 2) the territorial boundaries it would be confined to to avoid confirmed existence makes it seem less likely
It doesn’t matter if people are out looking for Bigfoot. Bigfoot can hear us coming, they can see us coming and it’s very likely that they can feel is coming.
They have enough natural intelligence so that, if they don’t want to be seen, they won’t be seen.
Even an experienced hunter is simply a “babe in the woods” compared to an intelligent hominoid adapted to living in the wilds.
Caves would provide shelter but not food. The rarely explored forests bit is basically a God of the gaps argument. People do go hunting/trapping for plenty of other gamethat would encroach on its territory.
I still think people saw bears. The only descriptive difference is bigfoot walks on two legs. Bears actually can do that, it's just not how we normally think of or see them
https://youtu.be/_vqI_jC_qcY
I've seen the bears without fur
Speaking of ridiculous... I'm on a Samsung burner phone waiting on an insurance replacement. Don't have a Facebook and I just got a notification from Facebook saying "Shawn Lovitt just posted in Bigfoot Now"... I've only typed bigfoot on this site
If aliens were here last year, then they were here 100 years ago. If they were here 100 years ago, then they were probably here thousands of years ago.
Did the aliens bring robots to dig up any of resources that they needed. No, we haven’t found any robots in the fossil record, and there are few descriptions of robot type beings in ancient texts. According to the heretical, biblical book of Enoch, the “gods” simply took a low level primate and modified it into a smart tool user. Tool users like us humans can do things like dig up gold.
At the same time, perhaps the same or other aliens wanted a stronger human slave, and so they could have created Bigfoot too. Or, some ancient books say that the ancient gods mated with humans which created giant offspring. Anyhow, once we have a good genomic data set on Bigfoot we can compare their DNA to our own DNA and help us answer the question: Who the hell are we?
Most people don’t know that before the invention of currency and the spread of banks, the predominant economic model throughout the world was slavery.
Once we start teaching all children that we, humans, were genetically modified primates designed to be slaves, it’s going to make it more difficult for the global elites to control us.
None of this shows how Bigfoot would be real if the government admitted UFOs are real.
You’ve given me a simple denial yet you have no logical explanation for that denial. Let me show you why:
For years, the same arguments used to dismiss UFO witnesses are the exact same arguments that people are using to dismiss the thousands of Bigfoot witnesses every single year.
A person who claims to have a UFO or Bigfoot experience is not an expert witness and therefore they probably saw a bear or a shooting star.
A person who claims to see a UFO or a Bigfoot is lying in order to get attention or perhaps to write a book and earn money.
A person who claims to see a UFO or a Bigfoot has no hard evidence, all they have is an anecdotal story of their experience.
If the person has some physical evidence, that evidence is either of very poor quality (blurry photo or video) or they probably fabricated the evidence.
Again, these WERE the typical arguments used to dismiss 100% of UFO witnesses. These arguments ARE still being used to dismiss 100% of Bigfoot witnesses.
So, the fact that the US government is admitting that they don’t know what UFOs are is evidence that some of the people who witnessed the similar objects in the past we’re not lying.
Let me give you another chance to answer the question. Despite the fact that the US government is now bringing out information about UFOs do you believe that each and every non-military witness from the past was lying?
Yes or no?
If yes, then did the UFOs only arrive to earth about 10 years ago and have they only revealed themselves to the military? Is that what you believe?
If no, then you are admitting that some of the witnesses from the past did see unidentified flying objects of unknown origin. They were not lying or mistaken.
So now I want you to explain why we should believe some of the UFO witnesses but we should not believe any of the Bigfoot witnesses.
I want you to come up with a specific logical argument or explanation for why only 100% of Bigfoot witnesses are wrong or lying.
I’ve given you four typical arguments that people use. But if you can’t use those arguments against 100% of UFO witnesses then you can’t use those arguments against 100% of Bigfoot witnesses.
You have a false premise and your conclusion doesn't follow from your premises. For our purposes, UFOs being real means they are of extraterrestrial origin.
P1: Many people claim to have seen UFOs and are not believed. True
P2: Many people claim to have seen Bigfoot and are not believed. True
P3: The United States government says that UFOs are real. False
C1: If the United States government says that UFOs are real, then UFOs are real. False
C2: If UFOs are real, then the UFO sightings must be legitimate. False
C3: If the UFO sightings are legitimate, then the Bigfoot sightings must be legitimate. False
What happens when you apply this to other cryptozoological phenomena? You have just proved the existence of the Loch Ness Monster, mermaids, ghosts and chupacabras.
“For our purposes, UFOs being real means they are of extraterrestrial origin.”
No it doesn’t. Some of the UFOs could be from black projects and some of the others could be from extraterrestrials.
It is very likely that the black projects got intentional or unintentional help from extraterrestrials.
In fact, in my mind it makes more sense that secret research projects have been trying to reverse engineer extra terrestrial UFOs. It doesn’t make sense that a number of scattered independent and top secret research projects suddenly made great progress in revolutionary energy physics and aerospace engineering all on their own without help from the worlds greatest universities.
Now if you’re going to spend 10 minutes discrediting the reverse engineering stories at Area 51 from Bob Lazar, I’m glad to let you do that and label him a disinformation agent put out there to confuse the issue. However, disinformation does not discredit all the real information out there. In fact, disinformation is a clue that someone is trying to cover something up.
Sure. Sorry for misunderstanding your meaning of the word "real."
In any case, black projects don't prove Bigfoot's existence.
There's no reason to "discredit" most of the other stuff you wrote; it's interesting. I'd like to learn more about great leaps in certain technologies that coincide.
As for Lazar, all he needed was some evidence. Him lying wouldn't necessarily make him a disinformation agent, but there is a lot out there that does confuse the issue, and some of it is deliberate for sure. Not because they are necessarily covering up the existence of an extraterrestrial presence, but to simply have it an open question.
The scary thing about disinformation is that sometimes it’s very hard to see it.
In the 70s and 80s MK ultra mind control was advanced enough that you could kidnap an amateur scientist and convince him that he went to MIT and was working on alien technology projects.
Then when your release your kidnapped amateur scientist he runs around filming advanced aircraft tests at Area 51 and tells everybody that he was working on alien technology at Area 51.
So they wouldn’t even have to erase his academic history because he wouldn’t have one. They found some amateur scientist loser with a rocket car and mindfucked him for life. I’m not saying this is exactly what happened, I’m saying that it is a possibility. This type of brainwashing would result in the inconsistent lie detector results that we’ve seen for Bob Lazar.