I'm talking about the rationale that allows the people behind it not to feel sinister.
So surely you've heard that we are over populated and in the middle of climate catastrophe?
Meanwhile all these useless plebes insist on living the ways they do using up resources and destroying the environment, hence "gaining control of the earth's population" and allowing a new system to regulate and manage birth rates would be saving humanity.
Secondly yes, atheists do often times adhere to some level of good and evil however yes, they only exists as concepts even in Gods eyes.
Remember that it was only when Adam ate the FORBIDDEN fruit that he began thinking in those concepts and then needing morality, a dualistic concept to stop him from doing undesirable things. Simply as a.member of this species you will have an aversion to killing other members of this species. It's hardwired into us being a highly social animal. What stops a wolf from ravaging all the other wolves in its pack? Simply that it is hardwired for more social behavior than rhat, in fact few animals kill their own species off.
Do ants need concepts of good and evil to stop them from murdering other ants in their own cony? Do they think they are doing anything inherently good when they are giving up their lives for their cony? No, it's just been n their genetic make up to do certain things, and to not do others.
Humans are no different in that. We are different in that we are bio-cultural organisms capable of assimilating and being governed by subjective ideas that vary from culture to culture such as ideas about good and evil, and we have consciousness and what we are conscious of can become as much a condition and factor influencing behavior as culture or genetics.
So yes, even athirst are going to rationalize things and they will likely rationalize them according to an IDEA of what is desirable for mankind as opposed to what is undesirable so when they (in their eyes) create the perfect society for humanity they can pay themselves on the back and take credit as being the founding fathers of that new world order.
Speaking of founding fathers, they had no problem killing off brits to establish what they thought would be a better society for the Majority of people in the colonies who themselves did not feel strongly enough the same way enough to join the fight. But the founding fathers had a vision of a more perfect society and they did it as much for the rest of the colonist as they did for future generations.
Make no mistake, the NWO has the same thing going on in their minds, but have taken it to another level and that level is an arrogant and foolish crime against humanity.
They feel they are fighting a war against ignorance and destruction by taking the reigns for all of humanity.
It's not sinister, no more than controlling the population via abortion.
It's responsible, it's management, it's the right thing to do, it's compassionate to the future of all creatures including our own species.
It can be rationalized as harrowing act of compassion, and rather than being seen as selfish and evil, it is what we need to do to save humanity.
I'm talking about the rationale that allows the people behind it not to feel sinister.
So surely you've heard that we are over populated and in the middle of climate catastrophe?
Meanwhile all these useless plebes insist on living the ways they do using up resources and destroying the environment, hence "gaining control of the earth's population" and allowing a new system to regulate and manage birth rates would be saving humanity.
That it was sinister is the ops words, not mine.
Secondly yes, atheists do often times adhere to some level of good and evil however yes, they only exists as concepts even in Gods eyes.
Remember that it was only when Adam ate the FORBIDDEN fruit that he began thinking in those concepts and then needing morality, a dualistic concept to stop him from doing undesirable things. Simply as a.member of this species you will have an aversion to killing other members of this species. It's hardwired into us being a highly social animal. What stops a wolf from ravaging all the other wolves in its pack? Simply that it is hardwired for more social behavior than rhat, in fact few animals kill their own species off.
Do ants need concepts of good and evil to stop them from murdering other ants in their own cony? Do they think they are doing anything inherently good when they are giving up their lives for their cony? No, it's just been n their genetic make up to do certain things, and to not do others.
Humans are no different in that. We are different in that we are bio-cultural organisms capable of assimilating and being governed by subjective ideas that vary from culture to culture such as ideas about good and evil, and we have consciousness and what we are conscious of can become as much a condition and factor influencing behavior as culture or genetics.
So yes, even athirst are going to rationalize things and they will likely rationalize them according to an IDEA of what is desirable for mankind as opposed to what is undesirable so when they (in their eyes) create the perfect society for humanity they can pay themselves on the back and take credit as being the founding fathers of that new world order.
Speaking of founding fathers, they had no problem killing off brits to establish what they thought would be a better society for the Majority of people in the colonies who themselves did not feel strongly enough the same way enough to join the fight. But the founding fathers had a vision of a more perfect society and they did it as much for the rest of the colonist as they did for future generations.
Make no mistake, the NWO has the same thing going on in their minds, but have taken it to another level and that level is an arrogant and foolish crime against humanity.
They feel they are fighting a war against ignorance and destruction by taking the reigns for all of humanity.