Note: This is just a thought experiment, not saying this scenario would be probable, likely, or even necessarily possible.
This is sort of a 'Trading Places' type scenario.
Tptb pick a certain date and percentage:
• If >x% of plebs are vax'd by date y, release the Blue Variant: the Nonvax'd are wiped out and the matrix continues with a more compliant base.
• If <x% of plebs are vax'd by date y, release the Red Variant: the Vax'd are wiped out, and we see how deep the rabbit hole goes.
Tptb place their bets, and the winner gets 1 fresh new dollar bill.
................................
Either way there is massive population reduction, and the human lineage goes through an evolutionary process according to a decision based on free will (sort of, enough for the satanic powers that run things).
......................................................................................................
(Yes there are other scenarios, yes people could just end up eating each other instead, this is just an idea outside of ones that have been discussed perhaps.)
I've thought about this but came to a different conclusion. It stemmed from a thought experiment that goes something like:
We can deploy one of two missile defence systems. System A will stop 80% of the missiles, but the other 20% will get through. System B has an 80% chance of stopping all the missiles and a 20% chance of stopping none of the missiles. Which should we deploy?
So, now imagine the following:
We have a virus that will kill 2% of people. We have a shot that is untested, but could prevent those deaths, but there is a 20% chance it will kill 10% of people. So half the people should get the virus and the other half should get the shot.
But I don't think that's what is going on. I think they developed the shot to reduce symptoms enough to allow a variant to emerge that is deadly enough to kill a large percentage of people who didn't take the jab. They intend to play politics and supply chain shenanigans so that target groups die from not getting the shot in time.
Interesting.
A slight variation:
RFK Jr. and others noted previous attempts at this type of shot resulted in populations that were hypersensitive to new exposures (such as these variants).
In that scenario, more of the vax'd get culled by the variants.
Then the unwashed nonvaxers, conveniently labeled broadly under the deplorable brand, are blamed.
....
On the other hand, MSM is all over the place w/ the variants.
They do seem to report that certain shots will protect against the variant Du-Jour.
Here is the problem with the hypersensitive population: they die from it and don't transmit it to others.