First off, it is important to clarify I'm not a proponent of TV fakery at all. To my mind, all that has been satisfactorily debunked. Notably not by AE911Truth or the Scholars, who merely dismiss or deny it, but by independent researchers not affiliated with them.
So: If you look closely at some photos, including this one, some parts of the cladding, and underlying structure, appear to have been blown outward (and some sideward) rather than impacted inward.
Also there is no reason the wings all the way to the tip would make an impact on the structure beyond on the aluminium cladding, yet this is seen in some images. The fatter part of a wing, closer to the body of the plane, contains fuel and the mechanism for the flaps, and is therefore somewhat weighty, more sturdy (relatively); but the narrow parts, to the tips, are fragile. They have a similar function and construction to the nose cone.
You may argue that the weight and momentum of the plane (behind the nose cone) will make a hole; but there is relatively (when considering them hitting those towers) no weight behind the wings, especially where they narrow. The building should have prevented their passage into it, but it didn't. The plane, in it's entirety appears to penetrate into the South Tower (when you watch the footage frame by frame), leaving a plane-shaped-hole in the steel structure.
Also there is a delay with the entire explosion anyway (in the south tower), again discernible by carefully watching close up footage, frame by frame.
Now, by way of explanation: I speculate plane shaped holes were rigged somehow to blow in the sides of the buildings, with explosives, some kind of thermate perhaps, who knows; and timed to blow out when the apparent plane struck.
It is not clear if this is the entire source or purpose of the explosions that happen after we see the planes. In the only footage of the north tower impact, it is possible to discern a delay in the blowing out of the right side wing-shaped hole. It happens a few frames after the main explosion, and even more frames after the plane is last discernible . You can just see it before the smoke hides it, when you scroll through the footage, zoomed in, frame by frame.
I can think of another semi-explanation, but it's more "woo" and you wont like it.
https://ajl.smugmug.com/911/North-Tower-Exploding/i-jVmJjrG/A bars on the bottom left are all bent inwards. If you believe it was a hologram, show this technology exists. That you can project a solid image viewable from all angles in daylight with no medium to project upon. At this point it's easier to just crash a plane into the buildings.
To fly those planes into the buildings at those speeds was impossible, therefore not easier. There are holograms that are projected onto particles suspended in the air, though they don't call it holograms - "volumetric projection" - and done on a small scale - so who's to say that the medium would have to be static, visible to the human eye, or even solid - although perhaps a specially coated drone/missile of some kind could have been the medium?
Operation Northwoods the planes were swapped out for different ones. There is evidence from the radar and tracking data this happened. Other evidence such as transponders still working after the planes had supposedly crashed. And the engine identified in the street allegedly was the wrong engine for the plane that hit the building.
The speeds that they were going, at the altitude that they were, are impossible for those planes to maintain for any period of time without basically breaking up, wings falling off etc. They are only designed to go fast at very high altitudes in much thinner atmosphere. And even then, not that fast. Look into Pilots for 9/11 truth.
First off, it is important to clarify I'm not a proponent of TV fakery at all. To my mind, all that has been satisfactorily debunked. Notably not by AE911Truth or the Scholars, who merely dismiss or deny it, but by independent researchers not affiliated with them.
So: If you look closely at some photos, including this one, some parts of the cladding, and underlying structure, appear to have been blown outward (and some sideward) rather than impacted inward.
Also there is no reason the wings all the way to the tip would make an impact on the structure beyond on the aluminium cladding, yet this is seen in some images. The fatter part of a wing, closer to the body of the plane, contains fuel and the mechanism for the flaps, and is therefore somewhat weighty, more sturdy (relatively); but the narrow parts, to the tips, are fragile. They have a similar function and construction to the nose cone.
You may argue that the weight and momentum of the plane (behind the nose cone) will make a hole; but there is relatively (when considering them hitting those towers) no weight behind the wings, especially where they narrow. The building should have prevented their passage into it, but it didn't. The plane, in it's entirety appears to penetrate into the South Tower (when you watch the footage frame by frame), leaving a plane-shaped-hole in the steel structure.
Also there is a delay with the entire explosion anyway (in the south tower), again discernible by carefully watching close up footage, frame by frame.
Now, by way of explanation: I speculate plane shaped holes were rigged somehow to blow in the sides of the buildings, with explosives, some kind of thermate perhaps, who knows; and timed to blow out when the apparent plane struck.
It is not clear if this is the entire source or purpose of the explosions that happen after we see the planes. In the only footage of the north tower impact, it is possible to discern a delay in the blowing out of the right side wing-shaped hole. It happens a few frames after the main explosion, and even more frames after the plane is last discernible . You can just see it before the smoke hides it, when you scroll through the footage, zoomed in, frame by frame.
I can think of another semi-explanation, but it's more "woo" and you wont like it.
https://ajl.smugmug.com/911/North-Tower-Exploding/i-jVmJjrG/A bars on the bottom left are all bent inwards. If you believe it was a hologram, show this technology exists. That you can project a solid image viewable from all angles in daylight with no medium to project upon. At this point it's easier to just crash a plane into the buildings.
To fly those planes into the buildings at those speeds was impossible, therefore not easier. There are holograms that are projected onto particles suspended in the air, though they don't call it holograms - "volumetric projection" - and done on a small scale - so who's to say that the medium would have to be static, visible to the human eye, or even solid - although perhaps a specially coated drone/missile of some kind could have been the medium?
Operation Northwoods the planes were swapped out for different ones. There is evidence from the radar and tracking data this happened. Other evidence such as transponders still working after the planes had supposedly crashed. And the engine identified in the street allegedly was the wrong engine for the plane that hit the building.
The speeds that they were going, at the altitude that they were, are impossible for those planes to maintain for any period of time without basically breaking up, wings falling off etc. They are only designed to go fast at very high altitudes in much thinner atmosphere. And even then, not that fast. Look into Pilots for 9/11 truth.
And yet with my own eyes I watched it.