Plane?
(media.communities.win)
Comments (22)
sorted by:
Oh trust me. They have MUCH more footage than that. They just won't release it
That tells you all you need to know. It was 20 yrs later, however, if you find that official us government groups were involved, then it could explain what is happening NOW, still, to this day...the takeover of america by criminals.
Cruise Missile their was no plane, the hole was far too small for a plane, and absolutely no plane parts or human remains were ever found. If you look closely at how low and fast that came in a plane isn't going to do that.
He most likely should have states body parts from passengers. Because of course there were casualties on the ground.
Right. But.... Those images you posted are clearly not burned beyond recondition, and are casualties on the ground.
Jet engines are designed to burn jet fuel. So... How did the jet fuel burn the internal combustion engines designed to burn jet fuel?
There is clearly no jet in the only image ever posted of a jet striking the building.
Only a cruise missile can so precisely strike the building as in that image.
The FBI took possession of hundreds of hours of footage. Nothing they are hiding can be for security reasons, especially 20 years on. It makes no sense.
Right, look at the size of an engine compared to a human.
https://www.standard.co.uk/business/rollsroyce-shares-crash-as-jet-engine-fails-in-flight-6532420.html
Then look at the images in your video. that has parts smaller than a mans calf. Then look at the size of a plain, then look at the image above that you claim has a 747 in it. Do you know what a 747 is mate?
Are you insane? Do you know what a 'shake and bake' is? Are you capable of rational thought?
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=cruise+missile+fireball&t=h_&iar=images&iax=images&ia=images
I went and looked up the capacity of a cruise missile before making that comment. They can cruise the earth surface at or below 50 feet using gps alone. A 747 is incapable of any such feat.
They feature daily tours, people walking thorough with hi res cameras every day. INSIDE THE BUILDING!!! Some grainy ass photos from a gas station camera a mile away doesn't breach security.
You're a fucking fraud. Simply saying things does not make them facts.
It would seem cruise missiles are very capable of such low altitude maneuvers.
It's interesting if you look at a close up of where whatever it is enters the frame
1 (before it enters the frame)
2 (after it has entered the frame)
In the documentary "September 11: A New Pearl Harbor" the claim is made that the white blob is the thing that has entered the frame, be it a plane or a missile or a graphic overlay. However this ignores the blob to the left of the white blob. It's colored blueish/purplish, looks shiny, with a highlight on top. The white blob is behind it, like a smoke or vapor trail.
The colors correlate to the color of AA177 in my opinion:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Airlines_Flight_77#/media/File:Boeing_757-223,_American_Airlines_AN0290718.jpg
However, it's shape is unclear, and it looks too small to be the plane it is supposed to be.
Several eye witnesses say they saw a plane fly into the pentagon, and not just towards it along a different trajectory or whatever.
And yet we know the flight path is not physically possible.
So to answer your question, "Plane?"... probably not, but it looked like one to some.
The corkscrew maneuver being too tight + followed directly by flying level close to the ground, these maneuvers were far beyond the ability of the pilot, and even beyond the ability of experienced pilots of a plane like that. What really makes it impossible though, is that it was going impossibly fast for that low altitude. AA77, a Boeing 757, would not be able to fly like that and stay in one piece. The same goes for the planes we all saw that hit the towers. They would have broken up much further back from their targets at the speed and altitude they were going, i.e. the wings would have come off. Boeing 757 can only reach comparable speed while flying level at a high altitude, in thinner atmosphere.
Interesting! Thanks for the contribution!
It would be really easy to make a missile look like a plane by sticking a fascia of a plane on it.
Just like a person could look like a monster by dressing up in a monster suit, and then releasing 1 single frame on a messy 1970s television quality image with lots of defects
Which agency owns this footage? The FBI?
That tells you all you need to know
Fuck you Mueller