https://patriots.win/p/12j0HuSoMN/x/c/4J9OUKAdzK4
HCQ treats:
SARS-COV
SARS-COV2
HIV
Which they knew in 1995:
https://www.clinicaltherapeutics.com/article/0149-2918(95)80039-5/pdf
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0149291895800395
But kept silent until they released their “blockbuster drug” Atripla in 2006.
Millions died, because HCQ wasn’t profitable or patentable.
See a pattern here?
NIH funds the universities, hospitals, “scientists,” “researchers,” “journals” etc etc etc
They are not “heroes.”
They are war criminals.
Don’t you just love their formal recognition of “Juneteenth,” as they sit here and still refuse to admit their lies that killed millions?
Your claim about the Rockefellers is interesting but your contemplation about viruses in general is a little sketch. Viruses are essentially functional housings of genetic material that allows that material to replicate using the “machinery” of other living things, like bacteria or animal cells. This is well documented and an understanding of genetics and evolution will allow you to see this is more than plausible. I’m not sure where you’re looking that a virus was described as similar to a bacteria but because they are so small you need electron microscopes to view them, and by the time this was invented viruses were known not to resemble bacteria. The word “bacteriophage” is just given to some of them because they infect and “devour” bacteria.
HCQ may treat HIV, and seeing some evidence for it I would believe it, but it does so because because of the mechanism of action HCQ has on HIV’s replication inside of T cells, not because HCQ works on organisms of any specific size.
His understanding comes from Terrain Theory, and a rejection of Germ Theory.
Biochemistry debunks Corona Virus, a look at Terrain theory
I’m all for questioning established science especially in the face of corporate business like pharma, but there is so much wrong information in that video. Nutrient deficiency of ANY type will make you more susceptible to disease, both of a pathological nature and not. Germ theory is well understood and MUCH of biology, from basic evolution to immunology to medicine at large accounts for this. I’m intrigued to look up the points about Spanish flu infectivity but I’m aware of several disease which have shown causation from particular “germs” which should be proof enough for germ theory legitimacy. Right?
I must say, you watched the whole video? In this day and age, that is rare.
Here are some more videos may wish to view.
There is a non-viral version of AIDS, there are non viral versions of hepatitis, the herpes genes are in our genome, the ebola virus is a bacteria.
Can you point to any one virus in particular? In addition, it is asserted that viruses, are no more then genetic debris in exomes. With that in mind, terrain theory agrees that viruses do exist, though that they are just far less important then germ theory asserts.
Do vaccines even make sense? You inject a pathogen to become resistant to it? Snake charmers do this with venom, and it's a dangerous way to build an immunity to snake bites.
Are there any air born viruses?
Isn't the spike protean the actual virus?
You really didn't point out anything in particular though did you?