Not entirely, but it is true, after the Reformation a 100 year conflict in Europe, history was largely reformed by two leading historians, rewritten and adapted to suite a new narrative of change from the competing factions. This happened in the 1600s. They burnt books like the nazis, they destroyed entire libraries, churches changed. This had already happened frequently in history prior with its invasions and empires and sackings. Rome Alexandria Babylon Tyre Jerusalem Persia etc. The Chinese also burnt the books rewriting history on new Empires changing dynasty's. The Spanish rewrote Aztec and Incan history. The British Empire establishing countries. The fall of empires. The Ottoman. The Japanese. Etc etc. The rise of Christianity, and Islam.
History is an interpretation, some is recorded fact so and so existed and can be verified and established. But so much more of it is lies, lies designed to exploit the truth because a victor decides the later course of change, often from war, or twisted into religion, or the revolutions that followed its retellings.
Today they rig narratives through google providing a version of the truth on its search engine. It decides it only airs such from predesigned searches prompting you not question or research much further.
No not all of history is lies, there just isn't much truth in history at all, apart from certain facts and dates which can be traced back to people and places and events that occurred. Although the narratives behind history are often entirely dubious, and are designed to exploit the mindsets of those retelling it. These can change over time.
The Nazi book burning is also manipulated history. What was burned was Marxist educational books of sexual perversion from the institute of sexuality (Institut für Sexualwissenschaft). Its head Magnus Hirschfeld and the institute were pushing homosexuality, sexualizing children,and they pioneered transgenderism. The burning was taken up by the students to push back against the perversion.
Perhaps, it was a figure of speech. Not that I was aware of which books they burnt only that there was bonfires of books. Seen in pictures, and read in visual descriptions. Didn't the communists do likewise? Forbidden books. Look at China now.
This historical pyre has happened in history previously in the reformation where they burnt entire libraries of books because religious factions had changed. It has also happened in Chinese history changing dynasty often through bloody civil war, and the library of Alexandria, possibly the sacking of Jerusalem and Rome etc.
Examples, they are trying to do this today with their woke fanaticism exploited by communists seeking only Western decline. As corrupt megacorps profit.
Until look at Dutch football 7 blacks on a white national team of 11 plus more on the sub bench, isn't progress, it is epic stupidity, it isn't equal rights, it is a malign misrepresentation of toxic advertising. Blacks aren't better at football or they would perform in the African league. They are statistically the worst football soccer players in the World every other demographic is statistically better. Instead white players aren't being invested into equally by a corrupt sport robbing the fans in the tax havens created. As a result there are increasing foreigners inserted into its leagues. Supposedly running bullshit diversity, it ain't diverse if the Dutch are playing immigrants and refugees, it is an insult to every other kid not having opportunity. This is the level we are at. No opportunity for the national. Stadiums aren't full. Who are they sponsoring? There are next to no black fans. Just white people paying for bullshit oppression. They are oppressed when their opportunity and their kids opportunity is stifled and increasingly taxed and pays somebody else to exploit them.
It was more a removal of a red shirt from the white clothes that are about to be washed. The books and the institute were a byproduct of an invasion and subversion plot so they were enemy contraband that needed to be gone . I think the closest thing today would be for the whites (males) in school realizing what CRT is and acting against and destroying the material that is made to influence them. Its preservation instead of being a doing away of a past legacy .
I don't believe in burning books at all. Even the worst books have stories or can be debated against. Sure you can restrict them instead of promoting them. But never burning them.
Although by all means burn the media influencing corrupt society. The narrative is at fault.
That narrative as an example is 7 blacks on a white national team of 11. In a population of 17 million with 500,000 blacks. There are virtually no black fans the country above is white. Do tell me why it hasn't invested equally into its youth? Instead of it only inserting foreigners, robbing the taxes. It is so corrupt who are they celebrating. They are being robbed blind. Inflation just to watch an African national Dutch team in a semi empty stadium today is 200-400 percent more then when it was a national Dutch team. Yet those dumb white supporters will cheer for what, what are they cheering for. It ain't diversity if they're not even Dutch. What is Holland it is this other place for Africans to steal their taxes. Look at that national team.
Not entirely, but it is true, after the Reformation a 100 year conflict in Europe, history was largely reformed by two leading historians, rewritten and adapted to suite a new narrative of change from the competing factions. This happened in the 1600s. They burnt books like the nazis, they destroyed entire libraries, churches changed. This had already happened frequently in history prior with its invasions and empires and sackings. Rome Alexandria Babylon Tyre Jerusalem Persia etc. The Chinese also burnt the books rewriting history on new Empires changing dynasty's. The Spanish rewrote Aztec and Incan history. The British Empire establishing countries. The fall of empires. The Ottoman. The Japanese. Etc etc. The rise of Christianity, and Islam.
History is an interpretation, some is recorded fact so and so existed and can be verified and established. But so much more of it is lies, lies designed to exploit the truth because a victor decides the later course of change, often from war, or twisted into religion, or the revolutions that followed its retellings.
Today they rig narratives through google providing a version of the truth on its search engine. It decides it only airs such from predesigned searches prompting you not question or research much further.
No not all of history is lies, there just isn't much truth in history at all, apart from certain facts and dates which can be traced back to people and places and events that occurred. Although the narratives behind history are often entirely dubious, and are designed to exploit the mindsets of those retelling it. These can change over time.
The Nazi book burning is also manipulated history. What was burned was Marxist educational books of sexual perversion from the institute of sexuality (Institut für Sexualwissenschaft). Its head Magnus Hirschfeld and the institute were pushing homosexuality, sexualizing children,and they pioneered transgenderism. The burning was taken up by the students to push back against the perversion.
Perhaps, it was a figure of speech. Not that I was aware of which books they burnt only that there was bonfires of books. Seen in pictures, and read in visual descriptions. Didn't the communists do likewise? Forbidden books. Look at China now.
This historical pyre has happened in history previously in the reformation where they burnt entire libraries of books because religious factions had changed. It has also happened in Chinese history changing dynasty often through bloody civil war, and the library of Alexandria, possibly the sacking of Jerusalem and Rome etc.
Examples, they are trying to do this today with their woke fanaticism exploited by communists seeking only Western decline. As corrupt megacorps profit.
Until look at Dutch football 7 blacks on a white national team of 11 plus more on the sub bench, isn't progress, it is epic stupidity, it isn't equal rights, it is a malign misrepresentation of toxic advertising. Blacks aren't better at football or they would perform in the African league. They are statistically the worst football soccer players in the World every other demographic is statistically better. Instead white players aren't being invested into equally by a corrupt sport robbing the fans in the tax havens created. As a result there are increasing foreigners inserted into its leagues. Supposedly running bullshit diversity, it ain't diverse if the Dutch are playing immigrants and refugees, it is an insult to every other kid not having opportunity. This is the level we are at. No opportunity for the national. Stadiums aren't full. Who are they sponsoring? There are next to no black fans. Just white people paying for bullshit oppression. They are oppressed when their opportunity and their kids opportunity is stifled and increasingly taxed and pays somebody else to exploit them.
It was more a removal of a red shirt from the white clothes that are about to be washed. The books and the institute were a byproduct of an invasion and subversion plot so they were enemy contraband that needed to be gone . I think the closest thing today would be for the whites (males) in school realizing what CRT is and acting against and destroying the material that is made to influence them. Its preservation instead of being a doing away of a past legacy .
I don't believe in burning books at all. Even the worst books have stories or can be debated against. Sure you can restrict them instead of promoting them. But never burning them.
Although by all means burn the media influencing corrupt society. The narrative is at fault.
That narrative as an example is 7 blacks on a white national team of 11. In a population of 17 million with 500,000 blacks. There are virtually no black fans the country above is white. Do tell me why it hasn't invested equally into its youth? Instead of it only inserting foreigners, robbing the taxes. It is so corrupt who are they celebrating. They are being robbed blind. Inflation just to watch an African national Dutch team in a semi empty stadium today is 200-400 percent more then when it was a national Dutch team. Yet those dumb white supporters will cheer for what, what are they cheering for. It ain't diversity if they're not even Dutch. What is Holland it is this other place for Africans to steal their taxes. Look at that national team.