Comments (5)
sorted by:
clemaneuverers 3 points ago +4 / -1

Maybe not. Someone posted the other day about the AI software they have now that writes headlines and stories.

DefaultFreedom 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, this is the best the CIA can do and the illiterate masses see baseless and Tucker Carlson and get all excited.

newuserfromreddit -4 points ago +1 / -5

Tucker Carlson said some “co-conspirators” (as they were named in government pleadings) were not charged because they were undercover agents.

Undercover agents legally cannot be named as unindicted co-conspirators in a court pleading by the government, because an undercover agent acting in their official capacity is not committing the crime of conspiracy. Naming them would be perjury.

Hence, the “unindicted co-conspirators” literally cannot be undercover agents.

Twitter just phrased the explanation like shit.

graucho 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes, and we've all seen - especially this year - what sticklers these people are for following the rules. (Do I need the sarc tag?)

newuserfromreddit -1 points ago +1 / -2

Yeah, that guy who tried to pause a U.S. election really was something.