So you are suggesting that a binary compound like ammonium nitrate would not make the type of explosions that Stalin did?
The type of explosions produced by ammonium nitrate seems to me at least very similar to "nukes", yes it is not sufficient evidence and I know this but it is at least more credible that a tooth fairy conspiracy.
So you are suggesting that a binary compound like ammonium nitrate would not make the type of explosions that Stalin did?
I didnt make the assertion, you did. That means the onus is on you to prove, first of all that Hiroshima and Nagasaki was "fAke nEwS!" and secondly all the bullshit you purport about Stalin.
ammonium nitrate seems to me at least very similar to "nukes
Oh really? Because "it SeEmS tao mE" Stalin was the tooth fairy.
it is not sufficient evidence a
No. ITS NOT EVIDENCE AT FUCKING ALL
Then my "feelings" prove Stalin was the tooth fairy if you're calling your "feelings" "eViDeNcE!".
So you are suggesting that a binary compound like ammonium nitrate would not make the type of explosions that Stalin did?
The type of explosions produced by ammonium nitrate seems to me at least very similar to "nukes", yes it is not sufficient evidence and I know this but it is at least more credible that a tooth fairy conspiracy.
I didnt make the assertion, you did. That means the onus is on you to prove, first of all that Hiroshima and Nagasaki was "fAke nEwS!" and secondly all the bullshit you purport about Stalin.
Oh really? Because "it SeEmS tao mE" Stalin was the tooth fairy.
No. ITS NOT EVIDENCE AT FUCKING ALL
Then my "feelings" prove Stalin was the tooth fairy if you're calling your "feelings" "eViDeNcE!".