They confirm virtually no claims.
They reproduce virtually no experiments.
They are virtually devoid of skepticism.
Never let them flip it on you.
You are the real skeptic.
Comments (2)
sorted by:
Choice of ignorance (want) over choice of adherence to self sustenance (need)
Free will of choice represents ONEs sole authority over self within ALL. We represent form within flow aka "followers" of the rules of flow upon form, and it is flow that communicates itself to the form within (perception); while form within flow represents a balance act demanding choice (free will) of actions for adaptation.
Form cannot claim flow; only use ALL flow has to offer. Claiming ownership (ship aka ONE vessel within ALL motion) over form represents choosing to ignore flow. They don't claim they suggest claims for others to reason (conflict between truth vs false) about.
The many represent the "experiment" of the few who transmute the comprehension of the many through suggestions.
Sketic-ISM represents a suggested belief system aka ignorance of free will for submission to a suggestion made by the free will of another aka ignorance of flow for form.
Reality is defined by flow; the suggested inversion thereof (fiction) represents consenting by free will of choice to suggested beliefs (-isms) from form within flow; which when consented to ignores flow.
SCEP'TIC, noun [Gr. from to look about, to consider, to speculate.] - "one who doubts the truth and reality of any principle or system of principles or doctrines"
The Greek origin correctly implies the natural connotation...assumption. Form within flow can only ever assume; because flow represents constant change. The translation "doubting truth" represents an inversion...truth and false do not represent states within flow; they are in ignorance of flow aka fiction.There's only change and that which cannot change...the rules that define how change operates aka the laws of nature.
They wield the lie; because they suggest us to consent to believe in truth; while ignoring constant change. The consent to believe (no matter what) causes the conflict of reason (truth vs false) which is a) a fictitious conflict and b) represents division through suggestion. They maintain theses conflicts of reason by suggesting contradictions to both sides (believer/non-believer; truth/false)...this is called talmudic reasoning.
Unironically posted by a Trump fanatic.
They handing out cognitive dissonance at Trump rallies, or what?